this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
58 points (88.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

187 readers
65 users here now

Ask Lemmy community on sh.itjust.works. Ask us anything you feel like asking, just make sure it's respectful of others and follows the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maiq@lemy.lol 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Capitalism is antithetical to democracy. Capitalism left unchecked will eventually lead to fascism.

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The first sentence is not true. The second sentence is absolutely true. It is funny how that works.

[–] Muaddib@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The first one is true.

In democracy, the people rule society

In capitalism, the rich rule the economy

The economy always rules society

In a capitalist democracy, society serves two masters. Both opposites. It's inherently unstable because it's self contradicting.

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Economic systems are not viewed in terms of who "rules" unless we are taking a Marxist perspective.

The first sentence of the post is and will always be completely untrue.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Bro just watched tech billionaires coup the US government and he still doesn't understand the problems with the concentration of wealth.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm looking forward to everybody getting red-pilled on Marx in the coming months.

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works -4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Far too many people have actually studied Marx in academic situations for Marxist economics to ever become mainstream at the very least. The simple fact that the Labor Theory of Value is fundamentally incorrect would be the major problem. We aren't adopting Marxist economics like we won't be going back to a Lamarkian perspective on evolution, because we know it is wrong.

Marxist sociology is what I hope becomes more common.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

In what manner is Marx's Law of Value wrong?

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works -2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

There are ways value is created that are absent of labor and Marxist economists have to go to extremes to justify the labor basis of the value. l

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 hours ago

Can you provide an example?

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works -2 points 23 hours ago

At no point have I said that the concentration of wealth isn't a problem.

I have said that it is false to claim democracy and capitalism cannot co-exist. They absolutely can and do in many nations. France is currently both.

[–] ChickenAndRice@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_purpose_of_a_system_is_what_it_does

Edit: Marx (and similar theorists before him) do a better job describing Capitalism compared to those whose paychecks depend on them not understanding / distorting it.