this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
315 points (97.3% liked)

Funny

7819 readers
702 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] otto@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

While I agree that assistive devices are necessary, and this could be used as one, I highly doubt that it was invented for that purpose.

Maybe

I suspect that it is for children to use so they don’t have to use a knife. Then again, I don’t know the last time I ever saw a child prepare their own food.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Isn't a child just someone who can't safely use a knife?

[–] otto@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Just because most children can’t use a knife safely doesn’t mean that anyone who can’t use a knife safely must therefore be a child.

That’s called “association fallacy“.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 0 points 2 days ago

No, but the person you responded to didn't specify. They just said what group of people would use these. Those who cant safely operate a knife. That includes children. I'm not saying it's made up exclusively of children.

You're mistakingly assuming that because it was made for a sunset that ist not designed for the larger group. It's designed for the subset, which forms part of a larger group. It's still, then, for that group, especially for the subset.

load more comments (1 replies)