this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
468 points (98.1% liked)
Funny
7819 readers
683 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
How did that not get caught in the prototype stage? Like, did nobody ever test that thing with that type of RJ45 plug?
It was only a particular kind of RJ45 boot that caused the issue, so if you are sensible and don't use a cable boot you never ran into the issue.
Just saying, this is not the fault of a single engineer but of a whole company that didn't think "try all common cable types" should be a required testing step before a network switch goes into mass production.
Cisco is where good engineering goes to die.
You don't have to test every cable boot. Just have a design guide that says "Don't put buttons above or below ports."
That can be difficult to accomplish...
Looks like they learnt and made a recess for the buttons.
And it's not in the center of the port. It's in between two ports where a boot should never be in the way.
That as well