Actually Infuriating

445 readers

46 users here now

Community Rules:

Be Civil

Please treat others with decency. No bigotry (disparaging comments about any race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexuality, nationality, ability, age, ). Personal attacks and bad-faith argumentation are not allowed.

Content should be actually infuriating

Politics and news are allowed, as well as everyday life. However, please consider posting in partner communities below if it is a better fit.

Mark NSFW/NSFL posts

Please mark anything distressing (death, gore, etc.) as NSFW and clearly label it in the title.

Keep it Legal and Moral

No promoting violence, DOXXing, brigading, harassment, misinformation, spam, etc.

Partner Communities

founded 1 month ago

MODERATORS

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

138

Help the homeless, go to jail: Fremont passes new law (sfstandard.com)

submitted 1 week ago by FirstCircle@lemmy.ml to c/actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The law criminalizes being outside with “camping paraphernalia,” like sleeping bags or cookware, without written permission from property owners or the city. It includes a provision that anyone “causing, permitting, aiding, abetting or concealing” violations is subject to up to six months in jail and a $1,000 fine.

“[The mayor] claims no service providers will get arrested, but ultimately, the law prevails,” said Vivian Han, CEO of the nonprofit Abode Services. “This is for all time, not just while he’s mayor.”

Greg Ward, a minister at Mission Peak Unitarian Universalist Congregation, said his church hands out “blessing bags” of food and clothing.

“Putting [them] in the hands of the unhoused could be aiding and abetting,” said Ward. “That could make us criminals.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] fuzzy_feeling@programming.dev 40 points 1 week ago (2 children)

“This won’t be utilized randomly. We have to articulate the ‘why’ behind this. It’s not just someone sleeping on the street and camping; it has to be a concern impacting community well-being,” he said.

so you always have to fear, that you might be the next one.
that's basic nazi 101

[–] FirstCircle@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

And Stalinism 101. Terror was wielded against all classes to make sure that nobody got out of line. Though I speculate that it probably started with the peasants/degenerates and killed far more of them than any other group.

So you're a lawyer or a businessperson or an ex-military officer in Fremont and you hand out a care package or even a $1 bill to someone who's homeless? You're under arrest, and you'd better implicate some of your comrades during your interrogation. Nice house and bank account you've got there, sweet smart kids too, it would be a shame if anything happened to them.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I get what they're going for. Many of the homeless are far from harmless. But read between the lines; the law is clearly wishy-washy and up to the street thugs to enforce as they see fit.

Middle-aged, well spoken, presentable white guy like me? I'd be fine. peter_griffin_meme.jpeg

[–] protist@mander.xyz 8 points 1 week ago

Many of the homeless are far from harmless

People who are houses are pretty much the same level of safety threat to the community. People in cars are a significantly worse safety threat to the community.

[–] fuzzy_feeling@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

that's what i tried to say, yeah.

"community well beeing" can and will mean anything they want.