this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
289 points (88.9% liked)

Lemmy Apps

5755 readers
1 users here now

A home for discussion of Lemmy apps and tools for all platforms.

RULES:


An extensive list of Lemmy apps is available here:

LemmyApps.com

or lemmyapps.netlify.app


Visit our partner Communities!

Lemmy Plugins and Userscripts is a great place to enhance the Lemmy browsing experience. !plugins@sh.itjust.works

Lemmy Integrations is a community about all integrations with the lemmy API. Bots, Scripts, New Apps, etc. !lemmy_integrations@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Lemmy Bots and Tools is a place to discuss and show off bots, tools, front ends, etc. you’re making that relate to lemmy. !lemmy_dev@programming.dev

Lemmy App Development is a place for Lemmy builders to chat about building apps, clients, tools and bots for the Lemmy platform. !lemmydev@lemm.ee

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Finally out πŸ™Œ

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Streetdog@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I hate ads and will never download an app that has ads for a platform that doesn't have ads, just so I have to pay to get rid of ads (which of course includes tracking you for the best ads).

"No added ads" is a non-feature.

I understand people wanting to support the dev, but is their code so bad that they really have to add ads to make money? Apollo never had ads.

[–] AProfessional@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

iOS users are more likely to pay for apps. ad-supported is common. Of course you could so both.

[–] Streetdog@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm a dev myself. I'd never disrespect my userbase by adding ads and tracking to my products. Instead, they can choose to pay for real features.

Edit: But Sync are free to do as they wish. Just weird that they add ads to an ad-free platform. You're paying for the problem they created, not for innovation.