this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
164 points (99.4% liked)

El Chisme

322 readers
1 users here now

Place for posting about the dumb shit public figures say.

Rules:

Rule 1: The subject of a post must be a public person.

Rule 2: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 3: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 4: No sectarianism.

Rule 5: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 6: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 7: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 8: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] piggy@hexbear.net 54 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yeah that's what "democratic norms" means.

It's the same as "rules based international order", it's a fake sound bite.

Democrats are similarly incentivized to keep these things off book.

In practice the problem goes even further the US has no mechanism to get the government to generally abide by its own laws when there are no damages or damaged parties with legal recognition -- even worse for foreign policy there is a standing precedent to not get involved it's called the political question doctrine which itself is not fully defined and unsettled law.

For example you can't sue the government:

  • to uphold Leahy Laws for exporting weapons to Israel because you don't have standing.
  • for partisan gerrymandering.
  • sue a president for terminating an international treaty

https://ccrjustice.org/home/press-center/press-releases/historic-case-dismissed-ninth-circuit-panel-rules-courts-cannot