If they try pull 100 dollar bullshit or fill it with micro transactions then I am out. Also I will not pre order this game (I didn't with 5) I will wait until its out and I hear good things from the players.

Just like I did with 5. Had coworker who was bragging about the game every day. Finally and picked up a copy at Vintage Stock. This is the original PS3 version only one I have.

[–] hydration9806@lemmy.ml -5 points 3 weeks ago (15 children)

Genuine question, why is $100 too much for a quality game? Completely agreed on the micro transactions though

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Hm.. how much is too much, then? If 70% higher than the industry standard isn't too nuch

[–] hydration9806@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Wow people really didn't like my question!

To respond to yours though, I'd say it depends on how much content there is! If a game can easily take 1000 hours with no degradation of enjoyment, I would pay $100 for it

Edit to add: I realize this didnt exactly address your question, but I'm not sure what percentage since it heavily depends on the quality and quantity of content

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

For me personally, I find it really easy to add "hours" to a game's runtime, and I'd sooner pay more for a higher quality experience and a shorter runtime. I've spent about a fifth of that 1000 mark in both Baldur's Gate 3 and Elden Ring, and they'd have been worth $100 to me. Indiana Jones was worth every bit of the $70 I paid, and it took me under 20 hours.

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Loved all gtas. Never played any for anywhere close to 1000 hours. Probably closer to 100. So that's like... 10$? Seems fair to me, no?

Funny enough, all the games in which I have more than 1000 hours are all f2p.

load more comments (11 replies)

load more comments (19 replies)