this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
124 points (98.4% liked)

Seattle

1659 readers
1 users here now

A community for news and discussion of Seattle, Washington and the surrounding area

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's a pretty short series of hops from Heller v. D.C. to McDonald v. Chicago to Bruen v. NYSPRA to this. If you're banning carrying at almost every place, public and private, then it's a de facto ban.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you want to argue it's a de facto ban then go right ahead. But the reality is most of the places we go are privately owned these days.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think that yes, banning firearms in certain privately owned spaces should be forbidden by law. We shouldn't be, IMO, be broadly outsourcing permissions to exercise rights to corporations, and allowing private companies to determine whether or not we have rights. We've already ceded too much power to corporations and private interests, and it's time to take it back.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't believe that corporations should have rights in the first place.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I'm less worried about corporate rights and more worried about employee rights.