this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
556 points (94.6% liked)

196

16822 readers
1028 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

oldie meme but needed to bring this back due to recent incidents 😭

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

oh okay i get it now. it’s… dense. i usually understand the more complex memes but this one is impenetrable to me. i’m not surprised others had a bad time.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, have you ever watched a Philomena Cunk show? Drag is wondering if that's part of what makes the difference

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

i have seen and love her show

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Bizarre. Are you used to seeing versions of the format where Philomena is 100% right? Drag has seen plenty of memes that do that, and drag thinks they misunderstand the format.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

no i know the format well

i think the issue is the second panel is asking the audience to infer what the opposite or opposing conclusion the author intends us to come to. and with the text given… it’s not obvious.

generally, it’s not rhetorically effective to place the thesis of a work behind a distortion. a lot of the confusion i see in those comments is just struggling to figure out what the authorial intent is because it’s A) not “common knowledge” and B) deeply obfuscated by the Cunk format.