this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
95 points (71.9% liked)

Firefox

20363 readers
8 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Also from Jamie Zawinski yesterday: Mozilla's Original Sin

Some will tell you that Mozilla's worst decision was to accept funding from Google, and that may have been the first domino, but I hold that implementing DRM is what doomed them, as it led to their culture of capitulation. It demonstrated that their decisions were the decisions of a company shipping products, not those of a non-profit devoted to preserving the open web.

Those are different things and are very much in conflict. They picked one. They picked the wrong one.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

DRM is opt-in. For sure it is kind of in favor of Netflix and Co. But they could just forced people to use Chrome, couldnt they?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they gave you a warning before it downloaded that would be fine. It also would be better if they had a option to completely disable it. (No popups)

But no, they decided to make it happen in the background with no user interaction. This is just one of my many complaints against Firefox.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is opt-in when you open a site that needs it.

Not defending DRM here but it does not get loaded until I allow it.