this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
739 points (98.4% liked)

World News

35827 readers
356 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] azuth@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There should at least be a path to a more democratic vote, where each country gets a certain amount of votes to equalise each other out.

Like the European parliament? The reason for the veto is because the EU is not a country nor are it's people a single nation.

Smaller nations would not joined if it meant everything would get decided by a few large countries.

So that France can stop our trade deals? No thanks. We'd rather pay for priveliges than do that.

France usually doesn't need the veto. They are big population wise and have a lot of influence being rich.

So we won't join, and the UK won't come back.

I don't know who are you speaking for but it's ok, if you don't like the terms you don't have to join. Just like it's not fair to change the terms on those that have already joined.

Same for the UK. They caused enough drama all these years.