this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2023
212 points (98.2% liked)

Fediverse

20684 readers
137 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At the moment the internet is flawed, do you think the fediverse is the solution?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phillycodehound@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think you're on to something. I'm all in on the Fediverse. I still have some legacy stuff on traditional social, but I spend most of my time here. Though I have to admit I love me some LinkedIn.

[–] Debs@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wait. What? LinkedIn? What's the draw over there?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reiver@mastodon.social 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

@Bicyclejohn

It depends on what you mean by "replace".

The Fediverse may cause centralized social-media networks to join the Fediverse.

There are some hints of that happening now.

Facebook / Meta has created a new social-media network that is part of the Fediverse.

Tumblr and Flickr are said to be joining the Fediverse.

So, some "popular social media" may become one with the Fediverse.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mir@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

In the sense that it would take over facebook or instagram? No, not a chance.

[–] itchy_lizard@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] couragethebravedog@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No. While it's not that complicated it is still more complicated than current social media. People won't like that.

[–] tookmyname@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I’d say if it become popular, but not too popular, that would be ideal.

That said,I found it to be pretty easy.

[–] tasbir49@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

For the general user, I don't really think so. Not unless a couple big companies run their own instances and search engines bring up specific instances to join. The barrier to entry is relatively complex compared to something that just "works"

[–] ilikenoodlez@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (4 children)

No it turns the problem from your account being owned by a company looking to turn a profit to random people on the internet. If we had a way of downloading our accounts and transferring instances then maybe.

[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 5 points 2 years ago

Yes but people run these instances to get users and help the community grow. A company is trying to make money from it.

It's a big difference because people hosting instances have no intention of making any money from it. It's the open source mentality of sharing because it feels good to contribute.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kichae@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Could it? Of course, absolutely.

Will it? Well, that's a much more complicated question, with a much more pessimistic answer.

[–] myself33@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago

As long as a hardware will be sold with microsoft/google/twitter/facebook by default, no chance fediverse replace all these well-established applications. BUT it's not a problem for me : i use what i like, open-source, and i let other use what they want.

[–] borlax@lemmy.borlax.com 4 points 2 years ago

I don’t think it will replace it, but I do think that it will create a place for a niche group of conscious folks to build a community without the capitalistic aspects of life that have ruined a vast portion of the internet.

We just need to be sure to keep perspective and be ready to support and our server admins/developers. The lack of big tech funding is what could potentially hurt us here in the fediverse. Nothing is free and it’s on us to pay our own way before advertising starts to creep in.

[–] 0xCAFE@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago

Yes, I think so. It could. Is it likely to happen? No!

I see a distributed architecture central to have a “public space” online that works in the long term. The communication infrastructure shouldn't be controlled by any single party.

However the way people work and the way capitalism works, it's utterly difficult for something like ActivityPub to become the standard. F**book joining in frightens and encourages me at the same time.

[–] wusterion@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

I don’t believe that it will replace it but that is maybe a good thing. I’d be Ok with fediverse staying in niche with active user base, because once it’s mainstream it’s gonna attract corporations to enshittificate it like they did it with Twitter or Reddit.

And I’d be cautious with “Internet is flawed”, it’s for us more conscious users but for vast majority of people Internet unfortunately is fine.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›