Open Source

38174 readers

142 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Cloak@lemmy.ml

kevincox@lemmy.ml

CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml

Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml

HyperbolaBSD (hyperbola.info)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Frato@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

FSF approved distro (now Linux based soon with own FLOSS-BSD-kernel)

Do you want to participate? (esp. BSD-kernel-dev would be very welcome 😁)

all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[+] Presi300@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] Frato@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I think it is a very good thing to have TWO options when choosing a FSF conform distro. Yes, for a laptop linux may be the more versatile option (for now...) but on a server a BSD-distro will be pure gold.

p.s. i have no problems using bsd on a laptop right now - it's a very clean and well made system and the hardware support is sufficient.

[+] Presi300@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] Frato@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

BSD based systems (with the according userland) have a very clean and more minimalistic code base. In the last years Gnu/Linux systems drifted away from the ideals of the unix-style (e.g. systemd...). For an end-user-system this may be ok, but the general design of the bsd-systems is better imho.

[+] Presi300@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] Frato@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

That is true. There are linux distros around with musl/busybox (alpine) and some distros without systemd. But i would really appreciate a fsf-conform distro with a fsf-conform BSD-kernel and the bsd userland - it's just a nice addition to the existing oss-os world. It is not about "this OR that" - why not have both?

p.s. both runit and openrc are close enough to the unix philosophy

p.s.s. yes, macos derived from openBSD and is using a sytemd-like init, but - as said - macos mainly targets end-user system... it's o'right for that - i think power users prefer os-designs closer to the unix philosophy.

[–] Tiuku@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

At first I read it HyperbloatedBSD, which made very little sense..

[–] Frato@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

made me smile, have an upvote 😉

[–] Frato@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

The community-manager (forum: throgh) is very competent, just register in the forums and post smt.

[–] deFrisselle@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago

[–] Frato@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

More information: roadmap

https://wiki.hyperbola.info/doku.php?id=en:manual:contrib:hyperbola_roadmap