this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
87 points (100.0% liked)

Beehaw Support

2842 readers
1 users here now

Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.

A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.

Our September 2024 financial update is here.

For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.


if you can see this, it's up  

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hey folks, we'll be quick and to the point with this one:

we have made the decision to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. we recognize this is hugely inconvenient for a wide variety of reasons, but we think this is a decision we need to take immediately. the remainder of the post details our thoughts and decision-making on why this is necessary.

we have been concerned with how sustainable the explosion of new users on Lemmy is--particularly with federation in mind--basically since it began. i have already related how difficult dealing with the explosion has been just constrained to this instance for us four Admins, and increasingly we're being confronted with external vectors we have to deal with that have further stressed our capabilities (elaborated on below).

an unfortunate reality we've also found is we just don't have the tools or the time here to parse out all the good from all the bad. all we have is a nuke and some pretty rudimentary mod powers that don't scale well. we have a list of improvements we'd like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible--but we're unanimous in the belief that we can't wait on what we want to be developed here. separately, we want to do this now, while the band-aid can be ripped off with substantially less pain.

aside from/complementary to what's mentioned above, our reason for defederating, by and large, boils down to:

  • these two instances' open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;
  • the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;
  • our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;
  • and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt and others of whom simply don't care about what our instance stands for

as Gaywallet puts it, in our discussion of whether to do this:

There's a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But it's not just that, there's a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and it's really hard to trust and support who's around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when there's more hostility around them. They'll even shut themselves off when there's fake nice behavior around. There's a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and it's not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we can't even assess that for people who aren't from our instance, so we're walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isn't sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe.

Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically aren't open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo.

and, to reiterate: we understand that a lot of people legitimately and fairly use these instances, and this is going to be painful while it's in effect. but we hope you can understand why we're doing this. our words, when we talk about building something better here, are not idle platitudes, and we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space, and we think this is necessary to do that right now. if you disagree we understand that, but we hope you can if nothing else come away with the understanding it was an informed decision.

this is also not a permanent judgement (or a moral one on the part of either community's owner, i should add--we just have differing interests here and that's fine). in the future as tools develop, cultures settle, attitudes and interest change, and the wave of newcomers settles down, we'll reassess whether we feel capable of refederating with these communities.

thanks for using our site folks.

(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thegiddystitcher@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Ok so TLDR for people who don't quite know what this means.

Beehaw are going for a walled garden approach and cutting off our access to content from some of the bigger instances. This is fine, it's their right as instance admins and it creates a safer space for anyone who was only browsing Beehaw local communities anyway. It's best they've done this now before even more people join, but it does suck for those of us who already built a nice feed.

As users we now have a decision to make. If you're an active member of a community on one of these two instances, you'll probably need to migrate your account.

If you're an active member of a community on another instance, bear in mind if that instance grows large you may then be in the same position.

The bad news is there's no easy way to migrate accounts here like there is on Mastodon, and we're going to have to resubscribe to everything all over again from whichever instance we move to. Unless anyone knows any handy tool or anything?

(p.s. It seems like I can still click through to my communities on, say, lemmy.world but presumably they'll no longer update. This is going to really confuse people as there's no visual indicator that the community is blocked from my pov)

[–] shiftleft@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

[Newbie question] I have seen and subscribed to one lemmy.world community (ProgrammerHumor), I can see it in Beehaw, I haven't tried to post yet but how does this defederation works? Its only in one way so I can see these instances communities by searching explicitly for them?

PS: I tried to find the answer in the comments but could not reach any conclusion sorry...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] loskristianos@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Disappointing, but understandable given the tools (or lack thereof) available for moderation at the minute. I’d like to see something like the Message Rewrite Facility system that Akkoma has, that gives you a lot more fine-grained control over what happens to incoming messages from other instances, although I’m not sure how some of that would work in this format. I’m sure something will come further down the line.

Personally I’m not bothered, I’m setting up my own single-user instance (to go with my current Akkoma one) so I can subscribe to whatever from anywhere without having to be responsible for the safety of other users. Then anything I see is my own fault.

[–] jcg@halubilo.social 0 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I think just like with email, systems will have to be built up to give instance owners more control of what other instances can do to their instance. I see a lot of infrastructure possibilities here, spam filters, relays, directories, so many things are possible and while it kinda sucks, it's also great that the fediverse has grown to a size where this kind of thing is necessary already.

[–] lwaxana_katana@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I agree with the general consensus in this thread that, though regrettable, I appreciate what you are trying to do with this. It is fairly straightforward to create an account on another instance to see other content if we want to, and I appreciate Beehaw being its own, special thing.

[–] Emirose@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I was about to say the same, I have only been here a couple of days, but I like the community here, regrettably I also like the communities on some other instances. I really wish there were better solutions for this because as long as another instance can still interact with Beehaw then I may end up using that one more often. Hard to tell right now, since I expect many other instances are dealing with similar issues right now.

[–] emi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

For the time being, at least, I will likely keep one or more alts on other instances.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EcstaticHumility@lemmy.one 0 points 2 years ago

You guys outlined good enough reasons for your decision. I hope this will make things easier to work with.

[–] Fluffybirb@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thank you for letting us know! I understand that it's a difficult and nuanced decision to have to make. For what it's worth, I really appreciate this call. Most of the reason I chose beehaw was to have a safe place where I felt able to open up more and actually participate in a community without fear of hostile or aggressive interactions, and having bad actors infiltrate would probably have sent me back into my online shell again.

I know not everyone will be able to understand fully, but especially if you're neurospicy and have difficulty regulating emotion, rock-bottom self esteem, executive functioning issues, etc. it is exponentially harder to deal with, process and compartmentalise (if possible at all) negative experiences online. I know for myself I need space and time to be able to build up resilience and internal processes to handle it, and bring thrown in the deep end is more destructive than helpful (I'm 36 and had it tried on me multiple times with people using the 'cruel to be kind' approach. All it does is dismantle what little self esteem I scrape together).

Tl;DR, thank you for making this decision and keeping beehaw a safe place to be until you get the tools and resources you need to open up again. 🥰 I know that if I do want to go and check out the other instances, I can just make a new account over there and still have my cosy place here to retreat to if needed for wholesome discussions. <3

[–] CalamityKitz@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As someone who works with kids that are very emotionally driven and often have low self esteem, I fully get you :) You're awesome, and we're glad to have you here!

[–] Fluffybirb@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Thank you so much, that's very kind! <3

[–] pixel@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So, not to be cold to this decision (because I totally understand that this didn't come lightly and don't want to "well ackshually" the mod team) but given I'm new to the fediverse as a concept, what does this mean for me as an end-user? Can I no longer engage with those communities at all? Or rather, what does defederating mean overall?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›