this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
87 points (100.0% liked)

Beehaw Support

2842 readers
1 users here now

Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.

A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.

Our September 2024 financial update is here.

For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.


if you can see this, it's up  

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hey folks, we'll be quick and to the point with this one:

we have made the decision to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. we recognize this is hugely inconvenient for a wide variety of reasons, but we think this is a decision we need to take immediately. the remainder of the post details our thoughts and decision-making on why this is necessary.

we have been concerned with how sustainable the explosion of new users on Lemmy is--particularly with federation in mind--basically since it began. i have already related how difficult dealing with the explosion has been just constrained to this instance for us four Admins, and increasingly we're being confronted with external vectors we have to deal with that have further stressed our capabilities (elaborated on below).

an unfortunate reality we've also found is we just don't have the tools or the time here to parse out all the good from all the bad. all we have is a nuke and some pretty rudimentary mod powers that don't scale well. we have a list of improvements we'd like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible--but we're unanimous in the belief that we can't wait on what we want to be developed here. separately, we want to do this now, while the band-aid can be ripped off with substantially less pain.

aside from/complementary to what's mentioned above, our reason for defederating, by and large, boils down to:

  • these two instances' open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;
  • the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;
  • our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;
  • and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt and others of whom simply don't care about what our instance stands for

as Gaywallet puts it, in our discussion of whether to do this:

There's a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But it's not just that, there's a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and it's really hard to trust and support who's around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when there's more hostility around them. They'll even shut themselves off when there's fake nice behavior around. There's a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and it's not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we can't even assess that for people who aren't from our instance, so we're walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isn't sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe.

Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically aren't open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo.

and, to reiterate: we understand that a lot of people legitimately and fairly use these instances, and this is going to be painful while it's in effect. but we hope you can understand why we're doing this. our words, when we talk about building something better here, are not idle platitudes, and we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space, and we think this is necessary to do that right now. if you disagree we understand that, but we hope you can if nothing else come away with the understanding it was an informed decision.

this is also not a permanent judgement (or a moral one on the part of either community's owner, i should add--we just have differing interests here and that's fine). in the future as tools develop, cultures settle, attitudes and interest change, and the wave of newcomers settles down, we'll reassess whether we feel capable of refederating with these communities.

thanks for using our site folks.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] parlaptie@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

It's gonna be a darn shame if users on the biggest lemmy instance won't be able to interact with beehaw or even see it. I understand your meaning, though, my most unpleasant interactions on lemmy have been with users from lemmy.world

I hope sometime in the near future, you'll be able to federate with them again.

[–] small44@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Is it still possible to subscribe to communities from those two instances?

[–] LemmyAtem@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Thank you for the explanation. This makes a lot of sense and I think regardless of how people feel about it, it's a great lesson for newbies on how federation works and what makes federated sites so neat. Like...you can come to beehaw and have a fundamentally different experience because of how they've chosen to federate (or defederate) from other portions of the federation. That may or may not be for everyone, and that's okay!

[–] MeowKittyWow@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Unfortunate, but I understand. I hope the moderation tools improve enough to refederate down the road.

[–] OverfedRaccoon@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I love Beehaw. It was the first general instance that was suggested all over the place, even the top on join-lemmy.org for a long time. I respect what you're doing, and that's why I joined. I like the local communities and cohesiveness. And I know it's just a few instances right now (pending revisits), but I'm worried that might increase. That, and DotWorld is growing quickly and has a lot of the 1:1 communities popping up to match beloved subreddits.

It hasn't made me rethink being a Beehaw member at all, because I do respect the ethos and understand, but it also means I have to make another account to feel like I can truly interact fully across the Fediverse. But between my Beehaw account, my kbin I've decided to leave within the kbin verse for the moment, making a new one will mean 3 accounts I've got to keep up with (really 4 with the NSFW-only one). It's not difficult to do, especially toggling between them in Jerboa, but it kind of defeats the bigger purpose and unification. Just a ramble to vent. Like I said, I get it. Hope everyone has a good rest of their day.

[–] lavendedreams@waveform.social 1 points 2 years ago

Sounds like y'all are taking the steps needed to protect your community, even if it's a bit inconvenient.

[–] wxboss@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

I made a comment earlier that I was disappointed by this decision, but after looking through other instances, I have changed my mind and now approve of this move. I'm glad to be here on beehaw where the integrity of the community comes first and is guarded with the best of intentions.

[–] HeapOfDogs@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Keep up the good work. Situations like this are complex and messy and sometimes you do what needs doin.

[–] sunaurus@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

What expectations do you have for other big instances in order to not defederate them in the future?

I am asking specifically as admin of lemm.ee. For context, we don't require applications on sign-ups, but we do:

  • Have Cloudflare bot protections enabled
  • Require verified e-mails
  • Require captcha on registration
  • Have (and will enforce) rules against abusive language and bigotry

Do you see a likelihood that you will defederate us if we grow bigger?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DarkWasp@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Thank you for your hard work and for creating this community, I hope it can continue to thrive. Still adjusting and taking everything in but it’s enjoyable!

[–] SindriDeLaMancha@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"we have a list of improvements we’d like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible" so out of curiosity whats on that list

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

So you miss the cyber suburbia safe space of reddit and find the rest of the net is scary and sad.

Reddit really has ruined a generation of internet users.

[–] pinkydaemon@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’m not sure I understand enough about the fediverse to grasp the impact of this. Can I still subscribe to these communities manually? If not, is that a technical limitation of lemmy? Because I can see removing bad actors from the ALL feed, but what would be the harm or need to moderate if personally subscribed?

[–] Nicktar@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

It's a technical limitation. In very easy (and therefore not entirely correct) terms, beehaw stopped talking to these instances. Beehaw will not load content from there, so you wouldn't get any new posts or comments on communities that are hosted there, and these communities wouldn't get anything you'd write because it's always the hosting instance that keeps the master-copy of all content in it's communities and only the master-copy is used to copy this content to other instances.

[–] GhostMagician@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What I find ironic is that there has been so much encouragement to not be a lurker and comment. But, it's by logging out and being a lurker that you can actually see new content not available on your instance once a defed happens even if you subscribed.

[–] reric88@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

I'm a new user so I my opinion shouldn't weigh as much as regulars, but here it is anyway.

I support this decision. Some people may jump to it being censorship which just is not the case. They have the freedom to go there if they want to. It's like keeping enablers out of alcoholics anonymous. The AA member can go get booze if they want to. But the enabler shouldn't be allowed inside. If they want in, they need to get in like the other members, not just waltz in through the door while on a kick.

I like this place. I currently feel like it's a great place, and the fact you guys make decisions like this reenforces that.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›