this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
87 points (100.0% liked)

Beehaw Support

2842 readers
1 users here now

Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.

A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.

Our September 2024 financial update is here.

For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.


if you can see this, it's up  

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hey folks, we'll be quick and to the point with this one:

we have made the decision to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. we recognize this is hugely inconvenient for a wide variety of reasons, but we think this is a decision we need to take immediately. the remainder of the post details our thoughts and decision-making on why this is necessary.

we have been concerned with how sustainable the explosion of new users on Lemmy is--particularly with federation in mind--basically since it began. i have already related how difficult dealing with the explosion has been just constrained to this instance for us four Admins, and increasingly we're being confronted with external vectors we have to deal with that have further stressed our capabilities (elaborated on below).

an unfortunate reality we've also found is we just don't have the tools or the time here to parse out all the good from all the bad. all we have is a nuke and some pretty rudimentary mod powers that don't scale well. we have a list of improvements we'd like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible--but we're unanimous in the belief that we can't wait on what we want to be developed here. separately, we want to do this now, while the band-aid can be ripped off with substantially less pain.

aside from/complementary to what's mentioned above, our reason for defederating, by and large, boils down to:

  • these two instances' open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;
  • the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;
  • our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;
  • and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt and others of whom simply don't care about what our instance stands for

as Gaywallet puts it, in our discussion of whether to do this:

There's a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But it's not just that, there's a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and it's really hard to trust and support who's around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when there's more hostility around them. They'll even shut themselves off when there's fake nice behavior around. There's a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and it's not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we can't even assess that for people who aren't from our instance, so we're walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isn't sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe.

Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically aren't open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo.

and, to reiterate: we understand that a lot of people legitimately and fairly use these instances, and this is going to be painful while it's in effect. but we hope you can understand why we're doing this. our words, when we talk about building something better here, are not idle platitudes, and we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space, and we think this is necessary to do that right now. if you disagree we understand that, but we hope you can if nothing else come away with the understanding it was an informed decision.

this is also not a permanent judgement (or a moral one on the part of either community's owner, i should add--we just have differing interests here and that's fine). in the future as tools develop, cultures settle, attitudes and interest change, and the wave of newcomers settles down, we'll reassess whether we feel capable of refederating with these communities.

thanks for using our site folks.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Costy@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago

Totally understandable

[–] mrbruh@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You are being incredibly selfish and should revert this change immediately

[–] Peter1986C@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

Pragmadialectics, mate. It would improve your posts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] projectazar@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (18 children)

This is going to be a learning process I think for a lot of people. Not just on federation, but on community building as well. You all seem to be trying to build something here, and I am willing to be patient and participate while it grows. If we get down the road and it just isn't working, I have faith that there will be open discussion on how to make this community grow while maintaining its ethos and we'll be here to figure out what is best for each of us individually.

Good on you for taking decisive action at these early stages while we figure out what we want, where we want to go, and how we want to get there on this relatively new platform.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] unsunny@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

I’m glad to see you telling us and coming forward on this, and that these steps are being taken. Lemmy is a small project, so expecting it to have robust mod tools isn’t realistic. Former Redditors here probably know that some subs have closed indefinitely simply because without good third party mod tools they’ll be near impossible to run safely.

Everything does feel quite new and volatile on this side of the Fediverse. The Mastodon instance I use has a very long list of blocked instances, especially since it’s aimed at LGBTQ+ users. There’s some messed up people out there, and I appreciate the action on the part of the admins. Just slapping a “safe space” sticker on something does not automatically make it one, and it makes me feel really good to be on an instance that understands that.

[–] fancypants@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Does this mean that Beehaw users can't access other instances?

[–] bankimu@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes. Can't access any new posts or comments.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ABlackWaltz@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The only instances affected are lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. The defederation from them means we can't access them and they can't access us. Other instances are still able to be accessed.

[–] fancypants@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

Thanks for the answer!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sverit@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago

That's kinda sad, because it reinforces the clutter of decentralisation even more :(

[–] eric5949@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Well I won't fault you but that seriously hampers my experience using Lemmy so guess I'll go make another account on another instance.

Edit: the more I recreate my account the more annoyed I am by this, you literally have the communities everyone joined and just ripped them away from most of Lemmy's user base. Not cool.

[–] eee@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

yeah ngl this is kind of a dick move. the fediverse is just starting out and the worst thing anyone can do is pull thousands of users out rn. admins should have asked for help with moderating instead of doing this.

I'm personally gonna block all beehaw communities. I want the fediverse as a whole to thrive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nivenkos@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This does much more harm than good IMO - splintering the community at such a sensitive time of growth is a bad idea.

Hopefully there'll be the ability to block images in comments and posts, and better tools for blocking / detecting spammers, and cross-instance bans, auto-moderating hyperlinks, etc. soon.

But the demand for unilateral access to other communities' content is disturbing. The Lemmy federation works because of reciprocity.

Definitely won't be recommending beehaw for new users now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snorkitty@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

Thank you, again, for the swift work to keep Beehaw pleasant to read daily. I understand it is a minor annoyance, but in the long run, after learning what happened by some users from the two open instances mentioned, I have utmost confidence in feeling safe listening in with well-moderated instances like Beehaw.

[–] Username@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I am a moderator on the lemmy.world sailing community through my Beehaw acct. Will this affect that?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Filth@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 years ago

I understand totally. My main account is on lemmy.world and I cast no ill will for this decision.

This place is growing by leaps and bounds and its only going to pick up steam. Do whats best for the community.

[–] snorkitty@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

Also, thank you for providing a safe space for neurodivergent folk to connect.

[–] marco@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I have nothing intelligent to add (except signaling my support) and to remark that defederation and defenestration are incredibly close words.

[–] droneviro@vlemmy.net 2 points 2 years ago

It's the same concept here lol

[–] paulie420@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Hmmm; I am new to LemmyNet AND Beehaw.org; but have been falling in love with the platforms. However, I do want to see 'all' of LemmyNet.

What is the lemmyworld 'open registration policy? I ask because all I needed to supply to register HERE is a username/password. ??? Isn't that open registration?

Second, why not allow more moderators - please don't feel like you have to go over old stuff... I'm going to read thru some of Beehaw.org's PAST posts that I'm sure talk about this issue - but it seems like theres a great Beehaw.org community - if yer having issue w/ moderation, hire moderators; I bet the 'cost' is pretty cheap.

Last; what LemmyNet community should one join if they WANT to see the entire LemmyNet? I came aboard Beehaw.org BECAUSE I agreed w/ most of what the site stands for; but since I'm really getting into Lemmy I think I want to be where 'everything' is - good and bad.

Thanks for the explanation - even if confusing for a new user.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] jimrob4@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago (11 children)

New users: "I'm tired of Reddit telling me what I can't see! Top-down decision-making is ridiculous! I'm going to check out Lemmy!"

Beehaw: "Hold my beer and watch this."

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This sucks as I am a member of many Lemmy.world subs

[–] davido@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

Same, shitworks amd lemmyworld had some dank submissions. I lost around 6 communities so Ill make a new account there as I was already more active on their communities with this account.

I dont mind Beehaw doing this, its their own choice but I partly came here to see memes, and funny videos. Aka, get my scroll addiction fix.

I can understand they want a more mature community. I just dont feel like sharing if 50% of the fediverse cant even see or comment on it.

[–] SenorBolsa@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

This feels like the right move, at least for now. Ideally there would be a nicer more seamless way to solve the issue but that's not the situation right now.

[–] Blue@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

Thanks for working so hard on this community. I’d like to echo so many here when I say I’d prefer a strong, helpful community vs a large low-effort post community. Do what you have to do to keep this instance healthy. Thanks again.

[–] edo@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

Makes sense, given your goals for Beehaw. Thanks for articulating your POV so clearly.

[–] s3npai@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago

You guys rock, and I absolutely love the heart and should you are putting into it. Thank you for your time and effort to give us all an amazing, caring environment!!!

[–] TheLastOfHisName@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Growth comes with growing pains. Sometimes those growing pains mean making tough decisions. I see this decision as thinking of the long game, and I'm fine with that.

I have a separate account at Lemmy.world, and I can log into that if I want, but honestly, I've been enjoying my time here more. There are still some aspects of federation that I haven't gotten my head around, but I'm trying to learn.

Anyhoo, thanks to our admins/moderators for your transparency. It's very much appreciated.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›