this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023

148 points (97.4% liked)

Firefox

20485 readers

34 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.

Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner

Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

golden_zealot@lemmy.ml

148

Firefox 118.0.2 released (www.mozilla.org)

submitted 2 years ago by hal_5700X@lemmy.world to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Fixed games not loading on betsoft.com

How nice of Mozilla to also think of the casino games

[–] kubica@kbin.social 32 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If someone is wondering the change is not so site specific, but the bug report makes it look so. It's a media play fix.

[–] Kazumara@feddit.de 6 points 2 years ago

Yeah looks like the ogg vorbis files the site uses just have bad data in one field, and an older version of firefox was able to play them anyway, so they added back the special case.

[+] Metal_Zealot@lemmy.ml -6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Wouldn't that be nice, for a major corporation to denounce and actively deny a platform for a predatory industry that exists solely to take advantage of people's addiction. I'd respect that

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 34 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Super anti-gambling industry but I don’t want my browser blocking me off from sites by default.

[–] bappity@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

once a browser starts choosing to block sites for you as some stand in moral compass, things can only go downhill from there

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Exactly. Hell I’ll take a quick warning even that I can opt in/opt out. But I literally have a blocklist of gaming sites available I turn on with little snitch mini if I really want to. Point being it’s opt-in.

[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think that would be nice but I think it would also raise a lot of eyebrows if Mozilla unilaterally decided to parental control your access to the Internet. It's governance that's the issue. Consider this https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/14/politics/sports-betting-ncaa-supreme-court/index.html

[–] Metal_Zealot@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I get that ending the "prohibition" on gambling is good optics for the economy, it's like legalizing pot. All the shady aspects of the industry are nearly eliminated, and assures a standard of quality.
I guess I view gambling differently cuz... with pot or alcohol, you at least know what you're going to get. And when working through addiction, its a lot more tangible of a thing to deal with.

With gambling, you're pouring money into something you're not even guaranteed to get at all.
And for some reason, Alberta loves to push gambling advertising really heavily.

[–] Overland@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I get what you’re saying, and agree that the gambling industry is predatory on its face, but isn’t the preference for Firefox over Chromium(amongst tech people on the fediverse) largely driven by the idea that the web should be an open platform with open standards that renders and functions the same on different rendering engines?

[–] Metal_Zealot@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

True, sticking with foss morals definitely widens appeal and encourages firefoxes growth overall.
I just thought it odd to accommodate for a service/industry that could completely care less, and isn't generally something I thought the open source community would be interested in in the first place?

Maybe i'm wrong

[–] dack@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

They aren't accommodating the gambling industry. It's a bug fix for a media player issue. The text in the changelog comes from the bug report title. The bug isn't specific to that site, and neither is the fix.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

They’ll just go to edge or chrome to get their fix. We already have the rising Y’all Queda to be the morality police, we don’t need Firefox copying that mentality

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Wake me when it's more than a bugfix release.

Not EVERYTHING needs an announcement

[–] jsdz@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

Bug fix releases are the best releases

[–] alex@jlai.lu 1 points 2 years ago

Should just have [Major] and [Minor] in the post title imo

[–] jerome@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I fuckin luv Firefox, bros.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago

Waiting on the fake reviews detector feature