this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
1175 points (99.2% liked)

Political Memes

9168 readers
3047 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 178 points 1 week ago (53 children)

Remember folks. Fascism has never, ever been put down using words.

Arm yourselves. Help others arm themselves. Train with them and form networks.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 31 points 1 week ago (5 children)

As an European, I want Americans to fight against fascism, at the same time, it sounds like it would require civil war, and if that happens, then the sharks circling around US would use that opportunity to make some moves. This whole thing makes me uneasy. Y'all need to be smart about this.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DioramaOfShit@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Dont forget to buy lots of ammo. Guns dont do much without ammo.

[–] discosnails@lemmy.wtf 8 points 1 week ago

Organization is far more important. If the real shit pops off there will be plenty of ammo and guns laying on the ground. Logistics, secure communication, and strong, decentralized organization is vastly more important, and also what is lacking. If there was a real resistance, that's what they would be doing right now.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (51 replies)
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 115 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're not deleting it to say it doesn't exist, they're deleting it to prevent people from looking up their rights.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Can you explain the difference between? I don’t understand the point you’re trying to make.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

A lot of people I've seen online are acting like this is them trying to erase it completely. If they wanted to they wouldn't just change a website. I'm not saying that they won't, just that this is more about the suppression of information and that people should probably look this kinda shit up before it's gone. Get yourself a copy of the constitution in one of those neat little books your teachers always had if need be.

All I'm saying is that people are acting like changing a website changes the laws of the US. And I think that we should all brush up on our rights before the resources online become unreliable. That way when they try and break the law you can say it loudly that what they are doing is illegal and call them out in front of everyone. The justice system has always been notorious for punishing those that don't know their rights. It's why they literally had to force cops to tell you your rights when they arrest you, which they are currently not doing. Protect yourself because nobody in the system will have your interests in mind.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Changing an official government website, while inconsequential as far as rights are concerned, signals something much more than just suppressing information.

It means they are actively taking steps to rewrite history. To change how people see the government. Because if the people in charge think so little to update the site, the people in charge have much more sinister plans than to just update the website.

The law exists only as much as it is enforced.

They are clearly saying they will not enforce habeas corpus.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 8 points 1 week ago

It's the difference between actively telling people "you do not have this right!" and quietly twiddling your thumbs and shrugging as people look for the information.

[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.zip 103 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Ironic, since the writ of Habeas corpus predates even the Magna Carta.

Habeas corpus goes back to around 1166, which for those keeping track, is only around 600 years before the founding of the USA…

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 65 points 1 week ago (5 children)

The US was founded on ostensibly three major legal ideas.

Habeus Corpus.
Due Process.
The Magna Carta.

We don't seem to currently have any of the three.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] theUwUhugger@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I find it so strange how proud Americans are of their constitution, which was copied largely from British laws; who kinda shat on this part of their history…

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

The idea of habeas corpus was around long before 1166. We know other much older civilizations had courts and the right to a confront ones accusers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 71 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This won’t make me forget about Epstein, dumbass.

[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

From George Orwell's Animal Farm:

"My sight is failing," [Clover] said finally. "Even when I was young I could not have read what was written there. But it appears to me that that wall looks different. Are the Seven Commandments the same as they used to be, Benjamin?"

For once Benjamin consented to break his rule, and he read out to her what was written on the wall. There was nothing there now except a single Commandment. It ran:

ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL BUT SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Damn that hits so close to home now.

[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

wow almost as if the very obvious story about authoritarianism accurately described authoritarianism. who could have known?

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (3 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ltann0607@endlesstalk.org 38 points 1 week ago (3 children)

They're making up the law as they need it. Trump is history. He's the ultimate loser. He's a convicted felon and an unregistered sex offender.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] F_OFF_Reddit@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (16 children)

You people really need to use that 2nd amendment

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

The ones that cry the hardest about their second amendment are the ones that voted for this. The ones that want tyranny, because being tyrannical is OK so long as it's against those whiney losers you oppose.

The ones that want the second amendment are the ones that are so uintelligent and insecure that they need to buy a gun, or multiple guns.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (7 children)

My concern is that if we were to exercise our 2nd amendment rights to eliminate this totalitarian regime and then install a proper democratically-elected progressive administration, what’s to stop the Fox News types from riling up the MAGA masses into “taking back” the government and eliminating our new regime? Violence begets violence. There has to be a better way.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (5 children)

For all you youngn’s, even if parts of the US constitution is removed from the random government entity’s website—it’s still available in many MANY forms. So like. Don’t think this means anything other than making things about as hard to access as they were like 15 years ago (which is to say not that hard).

Just cause a government website doesn’t have some information does not mean that laws have or have not changed.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Please explain any reason why the parts that the regime in the US specifically detests and have stated multiple times are not true would be removed due to a "data issue".

Please explain how one can request a court apperance after being dissapeared by a paramilitary group with alegence to the regime that's better funded than the Russian millitary, when the library of Congress does not have a section on due process.

Please explain when the president declares that the country is being invaded and anyone he deems subversive is now labeled a terrorist enemy of the state, how one can request their rights when the parts of the Constitution no longer say that only Congress has the power to say the country is being invaded?

This is not just some random government site. This is the library of Congress. This is the first result of the word "Constitution" on every major internet search engine.

This is not a slippery slope, this is a drop into a camouflaged pitfall onto sharpened stakes covered in shit.

This was a test to see if we would notice, if we would care or be indifferent, if we would speak up.

I doubt there will be a formal explanation or investigation that will explain any of this to any degree out side of "opps, it was just a technical error" as if it could be an honest mistake to delete specific parts of a document which never has anything ever removed from it, only ever amended.

[–] Allemaniac@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

those people will always call everyone alarmists and doomsayers, until they can't because the last of their freedom laws have been quietly removed. The Nazi party in Germany didn't start roaring and revolting, it started as a fed up minority that kept screaming so loud until everyone believed they were the majority. Stand up, fight for your and your neighbours freedoms and dont give those rightwing populists even an inch

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago

This isn't about making it harder to access your rights. It's signalling what rights you've lost. Who can advocate for your freedoms when the highest courts follow this new doctrine?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Trump is doing anything to keep everyone from talking about Epstein.

It's working fuck this news.

[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Other way around. They're using Epstein to distract everyone from everything they're doing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Well if this isn't a reason to use your second amendment what the fuck is

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (5 children)

America doesn't just have a constitution. It is created by the Constitution. They are deleting America and patriots are cheering it on.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

and Americans once again will bravely sit down and take it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago

Somebody needs to do it. The entire executive branch.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So where are the brave gun owning defenders of freedom and liberty I keep hearing so much about?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

What a time to be alive.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›