this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
69 points (98.6% liked)

Privacy

40046 readers
319 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Homomorphic encryption is crazy cool! Performance of current implementations is the only keeping me from messing with it more

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

Wuuut? How?? 😅

[–] someacnt@sh.itjust.works 14 points 15 hours ago

Well, alike all other technologies, it needs to leave the lab first.

[–] AlHouthi4President@lemmy.ml 11 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Can you explain what Homomorphic Data is?

I am interested

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

DOGE entered the chat...
DOGE starts typing...

Homo??? 🧐😡

[–] UndulyUnruly@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

My basic understanding is that the concept of homomorphically encrypted data allows for processing of said encrypted data without the need for prior decryption.

Hence, it enables computations and processing on encrypted data (ciphertext) that yield results matching those from the original data (plaintext) without the data needing to be decrypted at any point.

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 hours ago

How is this then different from just processing plaintext in protecting privacy?

Phone number is encrypted but this tech still allows telemarketers to call in?

[–] JumpyWombat@lemmy.ml 31 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It’s probably wrong to assume that the general public will be sensitive enough to privacy to force companies to compete on that terrain.

But it’s a fascinating topic and I hope to see it in practice at some point.

[–] nixfreak@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 hours ago

It’s just too slow , hopefully it gets much faster.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 10 points 16 hours ago

Why would any company use this in the first place?

The general public is not going to pay a subscription (ew another subscription?) they’re just going to use the free services. “I already pay for internet”

There is no reason for anyone to use this, as amazing as it is. That ship sailed long ago and the moment an MBA gets wind of what this’ll mean for the data broker industry, it will be lobbied into illegality, at least here in the US.

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I don't believe this will work? I would have to see an actually working example though. With actual data, not matrix vector multiplications those are trivial.

Doing math on garbled numbers and then reverse garbling it? Easy. Doing text parsing on garbled text? Probably impossible, but I'd loveto be proven wrong. I also think you have to reveal what kind of functions you want used?

The homomorphism in category theory is often shown by a commutative diagram, where you can go from a point to another by interchanging the order of operations. In the below diagram for FHE, you can go from (a, b) to E(a*b) in two separate ways.

Even in math this doesn't work for all problems.

[–] felsiq@piefed.zip 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It works in the sense that the operations are performed on binary numbers, so text handling works the same way it normally does assuming the handler function is encrypted to match. Once you have multiplication and addition, you can make logic gates and general computing follows from there - although with the noise being amplified thru each logic gate, the more complex the functions the more bootstrapping is required and the less I see this being doable in the short term.

For a working example, check out apple’s homomorphic encryption page, they use it for landmark identification and afaik will be using it for siri whenever they get to that update. It’s slow but it’s already usable - I’m not personally convinced it’ll be used everywhere, but the technology is super cool and I hope it shows up more

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

assuming the handler function is encrypted to match.

Yeah, this is the thing I'm doubting / don't understand how that would work.

E.g. A* / navigation problems.

You send private start and goal points.

Either the stuff is truly private, then the program can't read it.

Or the program can read it, but then the owner of the machine the program runs on can just read it from memory.

It doesn't matter if it says "45124x5234234fgasdgf" or "Paris", because the program state will identify that. Even if you encrypt the entire location database (with stuff that's then fully known to the server) and it will still look up "45124x5234234fgasdgf" and the server can trivially decrypt that.

check out apple’s homomorphic encryption page

Interesting, but I'm more leaning on "they have a vested interest to lie about this" rather than "surely this is correctly working tech that keeps me safe". Like Amazons "AI supermarket" that was just a bunch of indians doing video surveillance.

And their explanation makes the same amount of sense as the blog post. I have no doubt that it can work for simple commutative math operations, over "smooth" domains. Where my doubt comes in is functions where the encryption would cause the operation to take place outside of the domain bounds.

How does an encrypted asin or acos work?


Anyway, thanks for the answer, I was recently impressed by GNU Taler, which also did something cryptographic stuff I didn't think was possible. So I'm not saying this is heresy and can't be done and trying to say it will work is forbidden, I just don't think the explanations so far are detailed enough.

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.zip 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, but why would Facebook kill their own business model?

[–] BorisBoreUs@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago

They wouldn't have to. They just release a ToS update, that no one reads, that gives them the right to look at all of the data sent for "optimization", or some other nonsense.