this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
104 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

72440 readers
2685 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It would be nice if they would switch to safer batteries like LiFePO4 for power banks. They rarely catch fire and you can put them out with a fire extinguisher.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Less energy density, though.

On the other hand, maybe a less-fire-risky battery would be grounds for increasing the current 100Wh maximum that the FAA places on laptop batteries.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 days ago

I would much rather have a safer battery, even if it's a bit bigger and heavier.

[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why would they? AFAIK it's less power density for safety gain - which is hard to market. The only way I see it happening is if we find a safer and denser storage medium or if laws force safer batteries.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They have less power density than other lithium-ion chemistries when both are new, but the dropoff over time is also less. That means that unless you replace your power banks fairly often, the LiFePO₄ version is likely to have higher density for much of its lifetime. They also tolerate at least double the number of charging cycles.

Not sure how to go about marketing that in our current disposable society, though.

[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Not sure how to go about marketing that in our current disposable society, though.

Ditto. The most likely solution would be EU regulations forcing longer battery life/better battery safety. Maybe the new law for replaceable batteries in smartphones could be enough, it includes a rating on charging cycles which could be the new "muh number is bigger!"