this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
22 points (100.0% liked)

Anti-social media

637 readers
1 users here now

Dedicated to antisocial behavior of social media corporations, censorship, algorithmic bias, filter bubbles, privacy and psychological effects of mainstream social media.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 

The ruling, which goes into effect within weeks, mandates tech giants including Google, X, and Meta to monitor and remove content involving hate speech, racism, and incitement to violence. If the companies can show they took steps to remove such content expeditiously, they will not be held liable, the justices said.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Social media platforms tend to argue against these rules for profit motivations. So I can see why lemmy wouldn't be on their side.

But these kinds of laws can also restrict usage of social media in strange ways. Do you want to post politically in opposition to the ruling party? Hate speech. Do you want to post about your minority's opposition? Hate speech. You want to post about how the police came and kidnapped your grandma and murdered your dog? Hate speech.

It's really hard to implement this type of content law without throwing away good parts.

[–] 9x0rg@mamot.fr 5 points 3 days ago

@rimu

> The ruling, which goes into effect within weeks, mandates tech giants including Google, X, and Meta to monitor and remove content involving hate speech, racism, and incitement to violence. If the companies can show they took steps to remove such content expeditiously, they will not be held liable, the justices said.

Cool.

[–] theblips@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago

Should be like this from the start. What other kind of media company can allow people to broadcast whatever they want?