this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
59 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

36095 readers
27 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PavelKorchagin@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Great, now YouTube is being further enshittified.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It is clear that YT needs income for its infrastructure and showing ads is a valid method, also to offer a premium account. If it were to see a banner on the page or even on the edge or below the video, it would be acceptable, but it is not when they destroy a concert with advertorials in the middle of the video or other too invasive ones that do not allow the video to be seen. With this, the use of an adblocker becomes a legitimate and necessary defense. If they still do not allow it, there is no other option than to use one of these front-ends or desktop-clients that exist, which extract the video without the ads, or go to adblockers at DNS level in the OS. Too bad that YT, regarding content offer, lacks valid competitors and this position can lead to abuse in front of the user.

[–] dogmuffins@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Too bad that YT, regarding content offer, lacks valid competitors and this position can lead to abuse in front of the user.

It's the same as any other platform - the network effect. People are more likely to produce content for youtube because thats where the users are.

That said, it's easier for content creators to support alternatives because unlike social media where everyone is a creator video content producers have a creator > follower relationship, so there's almost no cost to them to upload the same content on other sites.

I subscribed to nebula a while back. There's not heaps of content, and all (ok almost all) of it is available for free on youtube. However, I'm happy to pay provided that most of the revenue is going to creators, and I'm happy to support a non-advertising-revenue model.

[–] androidul@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

They already get a lot of 💰from ad revenue, charging for a subscription just made that revenue even bigger.

It’s possible they’re losing some coins here and there from the ad revenue that they’ve become so aggressive 😆

[–] BruceBanner@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I feel like extensions are pretty savvy for fixing this. If not, I will waste less time on YouTube. Hell, why not another big site getting over my limit for hoops that are worth jumping through vs value I get.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pineapple@lemmy.pineapplemachine.com -1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I actually do not understand the widespread hostility that people have toward this kind of thing. I watch a lot of content on YouTube, and I don't want to see ads, so I pay for premium. I watch a lot of content on Twitch, and I don't want to see ads, so I pay for turbo. Hosting a major video streaming website isn't cheap. It's not like these things are unreasonably priced. If you hate the ads so much, then why not pay for the service that the platform is offering you, and for the content that creators are providing on it? And if you don't watch often enough for ad-free viewing to be worth a few bucks a month to you, then why get so worked up about having to sit through an ad every now and then?

[–] LostCause@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I hate ads with a passion due to my experiences in the marketing industry and will go out of my way to never watch any. I also don’t want to pay for random internet content, especially not to companies on the stock market. (Though I do use Patreon a bit for some content creators)

Can‘t explain it much more than that. If youtube locks me out due to that, so be it. I don‘t get worked up either, I simply state my opinion on it where I please and if I‘m not wanted I leave. That‘s about it.

I simply hate ads with a passion due to my experiences in marketing and will go out of my way to never watch any. Can‘t explain it much more than that. If youtube locks me out due to that, so be it. I don‘t get worked up either, I simply state my opinion on it where I please and if I‘m not wanted I leave. That‘s about it.

Why don't you pay for YouTube premium? This removes all platform ads.

[–] damipereira@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I just don't think content should be behind a paywall. I want to live in a socialist utopia where content and knowledge is free to share, copyright is a relic of the past, and art and science blossom. Blocking ads takes me 0.0001% closer to that, so I'll take it. I don't want to pay, because I don't want money to exist, it's deeper than experience vs how much it is worth.

If I could download a car I would.

[–] foxuin@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago

And if you don’t watch often enough for ad-free viewing to be worth a few bucks a month to you, then why get so worked up about having to sit through an ad every now and then?

There is an awkward gap where most services (not just YouTube) don't offer reasonable pricing for consuming small amounts of content. So if you consume a lot of YouTube, the subscription price is justified. If you consume very little YouTube, you can probably suffer through some ads. But if you're somewhere in the middle, there isn't a great option.

YouTube probably makes fractions of a cent off of ads on a single video it shows me, but I can't pay fractions of a cent to watch one video.

I'd consider this to actually be a pretty widespread problem across the internet, where it's frustratingly difficult to buy small amounts of content for a reasonable price. It's either the subscription or nothing for a ton of services.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] adonkeystomple@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As irritating as it is. I do understand. The internet and things on the internet can’t just be free, and ads is how we pay.

I do highly disagree with how many ads they’ve been playing with implementing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] psysok@lemmy.ml -4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I pay for a youtube premium family plan. Best money I spend monthly. I want to support the youtube creators that I watch, I don't have to see ads (I block them anyway), and I get a music service included.

[–] authed@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Does any of that money really goes to creators?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›