this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
537 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

39466 readers
267 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xontinuity@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

YouTube is going to have a lot of trouble enforcing this. Lots and lots of people out there are going to be immediately at work finding ways around this limitation.

[–] samick1@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago (5 children)

We'll make some plugin that downloads the ad and tells Google it was "totally watched and stuff".

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 12 points 2 years ago (13 children)

Unpopular opinion: I like paying for YouTube Premium to get rid of ads and still make it possible for creators and YouTube to get paid and survive an keep offering me entertainment.

In addition you also get YouTube Music so no need to pay for Spotify. It might not have as good features but I listen to music specifically so I only search for what I want to listen to and don't want any algorithms anyway.

[–] mondoman712@iusearchlinux.fyi 9 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I pay for nebula, which is significantly cheaper and has a lot of creators that I am interested in supporting, plus extra content from them.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] WondrousFairy@lemmy.fmhy.ml 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Translation: YT tests randomly pissing off users until they get fed up and leave for another site. if a site tells me I can't partake of their content with my adblocker engaged, I simply find my fix elsewhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Steinsprut@szmer.info 12 points 2 years ago (12 children)

I took the L and started paying for YT Premium since you can't really get rid of ads on LG TV otherwise

Did it with a bit of malicious compliance and opted for Family plan using argentinian VPN, totaling at less than $3 a month (and constantly dropping) for 5 people.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] mindcruzer@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago

Honestly if I worked at YouTube and they asked me to implement this I'd quit.

[–] sangle_of_flame@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Oh, cool; more reason to use Piped and Invidious lmao

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dr0037@infosec.pub 11 points 2 years ago

While we are saying "fuck reddit", let's say "fuck you too YT". Fucking malware machine.

[–] A2PKXG@feddit.de 11 points 2 years ago (12 children)

Honestly, I've always been surprised as to why YouTube even tolerates adblockers. It's basically a no-brainer for them to bake ads into the stream and disable skipping

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] kek_w_lol@lemmy.one 11 points 2 years ago (8 children)

God the ads are awful. If they start blocking apps like Vanced and Browsers like brave, i will make a PiHole. And they can never block it.

[–] Bandicoot_Academic@lemmy.one 11 points 2 years ago

I think a pi hole dosen't work for youtube ads.

Piholes rely on blocking DNS requests to ad servers, but on youtube the servers that host the videos and the servers that host the ads are the same thing.

[–] catra@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago

Unfortunately this is a question that comes up very often in the Pi-Hole community where the answer is always: no, a Pi-Hole cannot block YouTube ads.

This is because a pihole blocks at the DNS level and YouTube serves their ads from the YouTube.com domain. Block that and you lose full access to the site.

They recommend running either uBlock Origin alongside it and/or use apps such as newpipe for android and freetube for desktop.

That said, I will always recommend setting up a Pi-Hole if you're able to as the benefits of blocking trackers and ads from the entire network (which includes your cellphones, smart TVs, printers, IP cameras, etcetera) is definitely a good thing. Once set up it is 99% a "set it and forget it" kind of setup.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] stargazer@lemmy.fmhy.ml 10 points 2 years ago

Fuck youtube and fuck their ads, this shit is getting out of hand

[–] sam@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I'd be happy to pay for video content/video hosting, but I'm not happy with any of my money going to youtube or google. Peertube is the future. 😎

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] basuramannen@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

So soon we will need an adblocker blocker blocker to use YouTube?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SevYote@pawb.social 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

For folks considering paying for YT, note that you get YT Music Premium bundled in with it. The music premium alone is only $2/mo cheaper than the bundle.

I got it when I bailed on Spotify, and gotta say, the app is a little less polished, but I don't miss Spotify a bit. Just putting it out there if you were looking for a push to get yourself off Spotify or a push to get YT ad-free, there ya go. It works out to $10/mo if you get the annual plan, so same as Spotify Premium, plus yanno, the YouTube benefits. It's a pretty decent deal tbh.

[–] uglytruck@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I use ytdl-sub to downloadt the newest videos from the channels I like and import into Jellyfin. No ads, nothing, just videos. Even thumbnails.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] themizarkshow@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I pay for Premium (bc I watch mostly from the TV using a console or AppleTV) but this sucks. Especially because how annoying and long a bunch of these ads are now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tristar500@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago

The big issue for me is the content to ad ratio is completely out of whack.

[–] Rule34IsAmazing@lemmy.fmhy.ml 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I understand why they're doing this, but if you make a service that was once free, paid (whether with your time, or money), it's not a good look.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›