this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
2107 points (99.3% liked)

Luigi Mangione

2066 readers
58 users here now

A community to post anything related to Luigi Mangione.

This is not a pro-murder community. Please respect Lemmy.world ToS.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 85 points 4 days ago

I love the smell of "Reasonable Doubt" in the morning

[–] crawlspace@lemm.ee 45 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I've been saying all along everything happened too quick for him to be the actual guy. It was pretty clear to me they were desperate to make an example of someone quickly and not accurately.

[–] dagger_punch@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Both things can be true, no? He may actually be the guy, but they acquired evidence illegally and still planted it to subvert due process (again).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They need to play 12 Angry Men for every jury before deliberation, but play it twice for this particular jury. That's not the kind of evidence you send a kid to the chair over.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Robotsandstuff@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

Eat the rich

[–] tomenzgg@midwest.social 66 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 66 points 4 days ago

Leave it to the NYPD to find the guy who did it regardless of who actually did it

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 48 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

It doesn't matter whether he did or did not do it just like it won't matter what evidence does or does not exist.

An example to be made was chosen, and it will be made.

The only question at this point is how will we react to that example.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's like the dumbest and laziest people set out to frame this guy

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 56 points 4 days ago

So the cops that qoute "just knew" they had the right guy by looking at him also planted key evidence?

So convenient that your suspect doesn't bother hiding key evidence and that you get a hunch that is right on point...

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not same eyebrows as the shooter

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Crooked cops? Who'd have thought such things were possible. Oh wait, everyone with more than two brain cells to click together.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›