this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
864 points (98.9% liked)

Uplifting News

14836 readers
401 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

That’s actually pretty expedient

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (9 children)

I like it, but with housing prices already out of control I wonder if this is the wisest? It's just going to make housing that much more expensive. Long term it's great! But I hope they have some fancy financial footwork to curb the upfront costs.

[–] sga@lemmings.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

In long term, you would not be paying much on electricity, which is a saving. The upfront cost would be higher, but it is a good move imo, because retrofitting almost always has some shortcomings, like poor implementation, or unnecessary damage

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It doesnt add a lot of cost, but it also doesnt help as much as you think.

In Australia its mandatory to have an (I think) 2Kw/h system installed. Which is about enough assuming its running at full tilt to power the air conditioner in the peak of summer on a small house. A mate of mine who knows a lot about solar said "2kw is about enough that your home is essentially energy neutral when you're not in it. So the fridge, water heater, appliances on standby..."

Of course when you start talking a national scale it does add up.

[–] sga@lemmings.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

maybe it is difference in cost of living, or maybe solar output, our monthly consumption in peak summer hits some 1000-1500 units (arbitrary for now), we ourselves do no thave solar (some issues right now, but fixing them) but we in theory can get 100--200 units a day here, more if pick a larger unit, so that is, almost double of our reuirements. In winters, we rarely go over 300 (we do not have centrallised heating, and electricity is used in kitchen, and heating water), with a lowered output energy (lets say 1000 units a month) we would still be thrice over.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Yeah theres a LOT of variables at play here. I saw a headline today that "Uk braces for 30C heatwave." As an Aussie I thought "Thats cute" we regularly see summer days into the mid 40's so you can imagine what our peak daytime drain looks like.

You guys also tend towards way smaller houses than us, significantly higher population density, generally cloudier weather, energy costs will be wildly different... so many variables.

You have to remember that without a battery, your solar generally only helps out 8 hours a day and those are usually the 8 hours when you arent home, and arent the times energy companies charge peak rates...

When my wife and I built our house and sorted our (fucking massive) solar system our consultant said "Smart appliances are your best friend. Load the washer and dryer, set them to turn on at 10am before you leave the house. Set the airconditioning to come on at about 3 in the afternoon so that you not only get home to the AC/Heat but your using energy that would otherwise go back to the grid and then once the sun goes down you're only maintaining temp which is way less energy intensive. Home batteries are still just not cost effective enough yet for us to justify one.

Dont get me wrong, even a small solar system on every house will make a difference. Just maybe not as much as people would like to think. The one benefit of having it be mandatory (and you're right on this one) is that every new house will se set up for it, wired in right and easily upgradable from whatever they make the minimum standard.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Along those lines, I don’t understand why there don’t seem to be thermal storage head units for heat pumps. Cheaper and more effective than batteries, at least for storing heat, plus less noise and expense as the system doesn’t have to come on as often.

Why doesn’t everyone doing solar or with time of use metering have these? Online I only found one example and it was only available in Canada

My parents had thermal storage electrical heat with time of use metering and it made a huge difference on their electrics bill. Seems like it would apply to heat pumps as well

[–] sga@lemmings.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

our peak summers reach 55-60 °C, but in uk's case, they have additional issuee of being very humid, in whuich case, the percieved temperature is much higher.

Where i live, we have both options for solar, that is either to use batteries, or int the days, we directly use solar, and send excess back to grid, and consume from grid during nights. This is kinda battery less (you still need some smaller batteries to get consistent power rates, but batter pak size would be smaller.

When my wife and I built our house and sorted our (fucking massive) solar system our consultant said "Smart appliances are your best friend. Load the washer and dryer, set them to turn on at 10am before you leave the house. Set the airconditioning to come on at about 3 in the afternoon so that you not only get home to the AC/Heat but your using energy that would otherwise go back to the grid and then once the sun goes down you’re only maintaining temp which is way less energy intensive. Home batteries are still just not cost effective enough yet for us to justify one.

that just seems to be a lot of power being wasted. but i can understand your point regarding batteries. We mostly use "dumb" appliances (read not iot devices) and mostly just control manually.

I on the other hand am actually not a huge solar fan, but mostly because we are running out of resources, good quality silicon, silver and other value metals, and cost of solar wwould actually start rising. I am more of a nuclear fan, but i undeerstand, that smaller nuclear reactors are still a thing of future, and I also kinda get why people do not like centrralised large reactors. To me, that is still the most efficient way to generate power.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

with housing prices already out of control I wonder if this is the wisest?

Electricity prices are also already out of control.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›