this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
948 points (91.4% liked)

Technology

68244 readers
4283 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Nah information should be free. Ghibli doesn't own its style. Fuck this copyright propaganda machine.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Is it really a 'move to allow' style prompts? They're just no longer preventing people from doing that.

It's weird that people who profess to be staunch defenders of art don't understand that stealing styles is fundamental to art. If enough people steal a specific style then art history just labels it a 'movement'. Look on this page: https://magazine.artland.com/art-movements-and-styles/ and you can see that the thing they're describing is a lot of people copying the same style.

Drum and Bass, a music genre, was essentially built on a """""stolen"""" clip from The Winstons in a song called Amen, Brother. The Amen break (you've certainly heard it even if you don't know the name) is copied over and over and over.

This is just the latest social media trend trying to shoehorn issues into the 'AI-bad' meme. Stealing styles is not unusual or even immoral. It is literally the foundation of art.

This is just outrage farming, because 1. People are familiar with this style and 2. The primary artist who made the style popular is against AI.

[–] J52@lemmy.nz 1 points 4 days ago

There's a word for it that describes the perpetrators well: BARBARIC. (and still, might will never equal right !)

[–] rdri@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I think it is also a kind of "you did a nice thing there, so I'll act as if I can do the same" display.

[–] Orisis@lemm.ee 0 points 4 days ago

We already have AI yet people are still illiterate and misspell words in the title. Really makes you think

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

I see it as enabling people to make images in a style they admire and would like to draw but don't personally have the skill. To me the concept of copyright is the only difference between AI art generators and say, springy leg braces that let you slam dunk like Kareem Abdul Jabbar. I understand there are business ramifications some people might object to, but I don't get the moralistic part of the outrage. Maybe somebody can help me understand by explaining it rationally without screaming or calling me names, but spitting rage at me is pointless.

edit: from the abundance of downvotes and lack of explanation I take it people know they're supposed to be outraged but don't know why. The telltale mark of meme culture, wear it proudly!

[–] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

AI does not know or create anything. Without stolen training data what would your fancy LLM actually be able to do?

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

It's not my LLM, but like most software developers I admit I "stole" the same training data to learn programming.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world -4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Ugh, why are they quoting that blowhard David Gerard

Edit: Lotta David Gerard fans here

https://www.tracingwoodgrains.com/p/reliable-sources-how-wikipedia-admin

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›