this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
732 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

68130 readers
3595 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The global backlash against the second Donald Trump administration keeps on growing. Canadians have boycotted US-made products, anti–Elon Musk posters have appeared across London amid widespread Tesla protests, and European officials have drastically increased military spending as US support for Ukraine falters. Dominant US tech services may be the next focus.

There are early signs that some European companies and governments are souring on their use of American cloud services provided by the three so-called hyperscalers. Between them, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, and Amazon Web Services (AWS) host vast swathes of the Internet and keep thousands of businesses running. However, some organizations appear to be reconsidering their use of these companies’ cloud services—including servers, storage, and databases—citing uncertainties around privacy and data access fears under the Trump administration.

“There’s a huge appetite in Europe to de-risk or decouple the over-dependence on US tech companies, because there is a concern that they could be weaponized against European interests,” says Marietje Schaake, a nonresident fellow at Stanford’s Cyber Policy Center and a former decadelong member of the European Parliament.

(page 2) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Wasn't there some big EU cloud project (aside from IPCEI, EUCLIDIA and the dotzen others), that was in the end used mostly by big US corp? Was it HORIZON cloud?

[–] tacocatgoat@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

A bunch of smaller EU firms should merge and get half as tall as one of the trifecta. EU companies should get them the rest of the way up to their same size.

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world -2 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ironfist@lemmy.ca 64 points 1 week ago (3 children)

They need to look into using alternative root servers for DNS and domain registrations as well.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 35 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Multiple countries in Europe are already working overtime to rat-fuck DNS. I'd prefer if euro-leadership remained blissfully unaware of the root DNS servers.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] r00ty@kbin.life 12 points 1 week ago

All hypothetical of course. Not convinced things will go that far without some more clear indicators.

The root servers are already spread over the globe. Enough of them are operated by non US orgs too to handle things initially, I suspect that the localised anycast servers located outside the US for those USA based operators would probably go on serving.

It'd be trivial to replace them anyway, and frankly we traffic would be much lower anyway since a lot of the Internet is run by us based organisations.

For domain registration on tlds not run by the us, they should continue to operate fine.

[–] cestvrai@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

We have I-Root and K-Root in Europe, these are certainly used…

[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

No one told the US to be careful what you wish for.

[–] thethirdobject@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In Switzerland, Proton is well-known but their CEO is more than shady, and Infomaniak is a better alternative.

[–] iarigby@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

they offer so much, I’m surprised I hadn’t heard about them before. ~~Most of their apps have proprietary clients though, right?~~ And they don’t seem to offer privacy features like simplelogin for email, which was the main reason why I subscribed. and additionally, one would then have to pay separately for vpn

edit: they have open source clients

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SirMaple__@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Cancuck here. I've moved all my services out of the US if possible. Moved almost everything to a dedicated server at OVH BHS and a VPS at Servarica. The only service I've kept with a US company is my SMTP relay. Can't go wrong with MXroute and it's not some big company mining all your emails as they go through. Plus if I have something sensitive to send I use PGP or use my self hosted Matrix and message it to the person.

[–] thbb@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I concur. I have been using various OVH services for over 15 years, and, in spite of some amateurism that sometimes betrays its family business roots, there service is top notch, because they show dedication to solving your problems.

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I sure hope so, but I have little faith tbh. Cloud providers have done a great job selling serverless solutions that are tightly coupled with the provider. Wise companies have limited themselves to the basics - load balancers, servers, maybe some serverless container solution or kubernetes. The latter can move pretty much anywhere with some, but not a whole lot, of effort. The former, have fun rediscovering the quirks of your new provider's equivalent of lambdas or whatever (or at worst, rewriting the whole thing).

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wise companies have limited themselves to the basics

"Wise" is subjective here. Using a cloud vendor's implementation can yield many times more efficiency, simplicity, stability, scalability, and agility vs rolling you own. Does it come with the cost of vendor lock-in? It absolutely can. Will that make migration to another vendor difficult? It will.

So for organizations that never embraced the cloud alternatives have had to maintain their own infrastructure or use commodity solutions, as you mentioned, to deliver their IT needs. How much more was spent using a general purpose approach with higher portability to deliver the same result vs a cloud providers proprietary version? Then include the time component.

Only time will tell.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago

I'm increasingly seeing ads about Canadian cloud hosting services. I just hope companies stat to look at local solutions seriously.

[–] intelisense@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We're looking at scaleway. They seem pretty decent so far.

[–] SW42@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In my immediate vicinity I can see a trend to insource critical infrastructure again. Not necessarily to their own servers but towards certified European data centers. Sometimes they manage to cut costs at the same time as the pricing structure for the big three is so in-transparent that they wasted a lot on unneeded resources.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

in-transparent

As a helpful FYI the word you were looking for there was "opaque".

[–] Jaberw0cky@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I've been closing all my US based accounts recently. I was looking for a non US based Password manager service a couple of days ago. I used european-alternatives.eu and looked at a couple of options before settling on "Heylogin" it is so good I thought I had better recommend it to others.. oh and I dumped chat GPT for chat.mistral.ai a couple of weeks ago, I recommend giving it a go.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 1 points 6 days ago

It's deepseek, Gemini, mixtral or bust for me. Chatgpt is so low in my personal rankings it's upsetting

[–] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Heylogin looks pretty cool, thanks for the hint. I will definitely take a deeper look into that!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wonder if I should sell my Microsoft stock.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DrunkenPirate@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

In just see no alternative to Microsofts Office tools. I think 99% of all companies in Western world rely on Microsoft office.

[–] ScreaminOctopus@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

technically libreoffice exists, they really need to fix office comparability though

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No, they just need to enforce PDFs for things that leave an office so everyone else isn't locked into loading and running a bloated mess just to view a read-only spreadsheet.

The analogue to the printed chart isn't an XLS6 attached to e-mail. It's a PDF.

That's it. Done.

[–] turnip@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

I'd prefer a Wiki style software that exports to PDF. Why aren't we all using wiki's, with build in version control and diagramming, like Confluence, Youtrack, etc..?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Those are moving goalposts. The LibreOffice devs do their best, but they'll always be a step behind. The correct solution is to get people to move away from closed yet ever-changing standards made by monoliths who wish to retain a monopoly.

Note that I'm not saying that's easy or even possible. Only that it's correct.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (4 children)

MS Office rules the corporate world because their standards never change.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 6 days ago

Open a document created in modern Word in Word 97. Then tell me the standards never change.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] turnip@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago

Europe broke their own procurement laws to use Microsoft, they have so many own goals they may as well just accept their fate.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›