I've received four messages. My guess is it's either a pig-butchering scam or a covert doxxing attempt, and the incessant spam is a means of baiting people to unknowingly take their anger out on the real Nicole by contacting her workplace/address. I didn't click on the link for the chatroom named "hell" but I did copy and paste the link into Internet Archive, saved the webpage, and only got an error page in return.
Casual Conversation
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES (updated 01/22/25)
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
- Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
- Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
- Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.
Casual conversation communities:
Related discussion-focused communities
- !actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
- !askmenover30@lemm.ee
- !dads@feddit.uk
- !letstalkaboutgames@feddit.uk
- !movies@lemm.ee
That bitch. I thought we were exclusive.
I'm low-key convinced that this is either:
- A spam vulnerability test for various instances/communities. (With good or bad intentions.)
- A doxxing attempt. (Some links lead to addresses.)
If the latter, I hope we can reverse the negativity by creating a GoFundMe for her or something.
I almost feel bad that Nicole hasn’t messaged me
Same.
A lot of people did. Like almost everyone knows it's a scam and people have been shitposting it and forming a cult
Yes frequently.
It’s annoying. But not as bad as the stupid community that keeps posting screenshots of it and spreading it further.
I think people are just goofing off and having fun with it man
It’s not fun being spammed with spam.
you can block the community
I did, and than memes started doing it too.
Do you know the origin of the word meme?
Who does she think she is
Haha I think she's here to greet people to the fediverse! She was wearing a different shirt when she messaged me!
But still the same bong peeking into shot. In every photo.
Yes we are making it a meme
Yeah, I did a week ago. Blocked the account. Got a new one today but the messages was surprisingly “censored”, so just blocked that account as well.
Just give it no attention. Block and move on, the person isn’t worth any attention.
Yes, and her invitations are a trap designed to steal from you.
Would be neat if automated daters came in men. Alas, they always come in women.
I dunno about that, honestly. The images are clearly screenshots of a webcam, and the matrix seems to dox someone's workplace. I think it could be a harassment campaign.
True. Boy have I witnessed a lot of that before. Sadly the people around these parts are none the wiser, which I knew even before I could relate to Nicole, supposing this is the case.
Got my first one today!
I have three of them in my inbox atm