this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
133 points (97.8% liked)

Degrowth

1009 readers
25 users here now

Discussions about degrowth and all sorts of related topics. This includes UBI, economic democracy, the economics of green technologies, enviromental legislation and many more intressting economic topics.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Okay, I will ~~buy~~ steal rare earth minerals from indigenous people. Thanks for the advice!

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 7 points 3 days ago

Not different and how it's works now.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago
[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

An inverted pyramid would make much more sense in terms of shape language. Put 'buy' at the lowest and narrowest point, like it's the lowest/worst option you have that fewest people need to resort to.

[–] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The original intended the base to be correlated with volume of food eaten. The buyerarchy version stays true to the original with the intention that someone use the first step the most.

I'd be interested to see your idea though

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 days ago

Here's a mockup, including driving_crooner's fix.

[–] Walican132@lemmy.today 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I also feel like make is in the wrong spot. Should probably be before swap.

[–] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

I'm guessing the thinking is 'make' uses materials that require purchasing. Perhaps it should be subdivided into 'make from scraps' and 'make from new materials'.

Use it up, wear it out, make it do, or do without

[–] RockBottom@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago

The addition of “steal” is an early crossroads for people not serious about developing Degrowth into a critical mass movement.