The majority should not police the fetish of some because they don't like it. If its legal, don't ban it.
this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
215 points (93.5% liked)
Lemmy NSFW
12241 readers
1 users here now
Updates about lemmynsfw.com
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Just a user here, but I'd say a small subset of users in other instances are already asking to defederate from this instance for some of the basic communities that show up, like gonewild. I just don't see allowing a fetish "at this time" being helpful to the situation.
The mod tools are not there yet, even if you added the ability to opt-in on just this instance. If someone subscribes to the community from a different instance it will show up for ALL USERS on the all feed for that instance. And well, thats just shitty (pun intended) for those who don't like the kink but want to see nsfw communities. Now you've put the problem on the users who must choose to block the community.
So, while I'm a big supporter of kinks, I am not in support of allowing it on lemmy today. voted accordingly.
If someone subscribes to the community from a different instance it will show up for ALL USERS on the all feed for that instance.
Wow, that seems like something that needs to be changed ASAP.
That's a feature, not a bug, though there's some debate on the Lemmy GitHub about the wisdom of locally caching federated nsfw content.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I assume scat means shit? Poop? Is that right?
It's not for me but as long as it's clearly labelled, can be blocked by anyone who doesn't want to see that stuff, and there aren't dozens of them popping up every day then I don't see a problem with allowing it.
I'm on a tracker that allows scat and there's a userscript to filter it out based on tags. Seems to work well for everyone. Maybe there's a similar solution for Lemmy?
Just let them have their own community. If this is supposed to be THE goto NSFW lemmy instance you shouldn't ban NSFW content as long as it doesn't break any laws.
Not a fan of scat, but it's harmless to me so I'm in favor of allowing it but blocking it on my own.
Same argument of the gore ban applies: https://feddit.it/comment/128064
The main problem with NSFL is that you should only find it if you're looking for it. I have noproblemi with it once better mod tools, instance or community options pop up with lemmy updates. As of now, I vote to ban it
Who are you to define what is nsfl. There are people in here arguing consensual non consent is nsfl. How long till furry or trans communities are banned too
load more comments
(2 replies)
Tbh I'd rather not see it, and feel like it falls under nsfl (which doesn't have to be illegal either).
I understand that it's a thing, but as someone else described it, it's like nsfw+. There's a huge range of nsfw from bikini shots to this or other stuff.
I guess I can always just watch the subscribed feed but that prevents natural discovery, and it's not the default.
So I suggest... Asking people to refrain from posting it for the time being until better filters exist. It's not exactly fair I know, but it's not like it's the only category that's questionable like that.
load more comments
(2 replies)
As long as it stays on dedicated communities, I don't really care if it sticks around. I just block the community from showing up on my feed.
Not personally my kink (kinda the opposite actually) but I'm loving all the perverts here having a constructive conversation about poop porn lol.
Lemmy on y'all
Allow it. If I have to look at gay furry porn you fuckers can deal with scat.
If people want to eat the poopoo, let them. It's none of my business.
someone explain to me how this is different from banning gay porn?
I wish there was a way to disable the local feed.