this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
387 points (100.0% liked)

196

16822 readers
1303 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 57 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Also society if @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks didn’t reply with a duplicate link

[–] mil@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)
[–] lud@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

Sync is great. It's also incredibly smart that you can easily link to settings in comments.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Oh neat!

Thank you for that. Using Voyager here myself on iOS. Hey if I hide the bot how will I know when to stop being annoyed about it :p

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It'd be great if there were some handing of YT video ids in Lemmy, which would be independent of the provider domain. So like in Lemmy you could link to a YT video by the id (not URL), and then based on the user settings, that would open up in Piped or Youtube based on preference. I guess this could be done client side, and rewrite youtube links, but then for people who prefer Youtube and get a piped link, you'd need to know to rewrite that link. Anyway, that's the society I'd like to live in.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

you could link to a YT video by the id (not URL)

Asking individual users to make that kind of change is bad UX. Better if you got the client-side change based on use preference, even though users just post the normal YouTube link.

[–] Syl@jlai.lu 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Xylight@lemdro.id 1 points 11 months ago

Piped is actually not a great platform for this because their embeds load the entire site

[–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[–] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"Society if Piped would actually play videos," for me :( I've had some luck with Invidious, but I haven't been able to get videos playing on Piped for some months now.

[–] clark@midwest.social 6 points 11 months ago

Freetube is my go-to. Barely had any issues with it.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago

The bot could link to the thumbnail using image syntax !()[] and add the title, channel, view count & duration; Piped even supports DeArrow for clickbait reduction. However, this would either cost privacy by auto-loading content from Google or add even more load on the "default" piped.video instance. Many people would also hate it even more for that.

[–] 10_0@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

Society if piped didn't exists, just use invidious at this point