this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10256 readers
295 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive Link from archive.today

Original Link from The New York Times

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bones_17@lemmy.one 5 points 2 years ago

I'm getting a bit worried about Tuesday's arraignment, as he's pretty clearly calling for his cronies to show up to "support" him

[–] nhgeek@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I really can't wait until we stop hearing about Trump.

[–] GraceGH@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I hate to say it, but I don't think that day will ever come. Even in death, his die-hards will be slinging conspiracy theories about how he was assassinated or how he was jesus and he'll ressurect soon to take on mega-hillary's doomsday army.

Hopefully we can at least confine it to its own section of the internet though.

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I need to figure out how to create conspiracy theories that are crazier than Qanon. Trump shit on the constitution and did ALL those illegal things to EXPOSE the cracks on the system. He's MAGA one felony at a time. He took the pallets of classified files ON PURPOSE so he could sacrifice himself to start the fall of America and Armageddon. He's bringing Jesus BACK.

[–] nhgeek@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

It's an extremely pessimistic future you paint, but you are probably right.

[–] shadowolf@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Damn, that disturbingly possible

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

And brought before his good friend, Judge Aileen Cannon, who was “randomly assigned” to the case.

Sigh. He's going to get away with bloody murder again.

[–] darkknight@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Let me know when he goes to jail.

[–] DevCat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Listening to Youtube, Beau of the Fifth Column, he says the Federal court he's in now in Florida has a 92-94% conviction rate.

[–] Gray@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

+1 for the Beau of the Fifth Column shoutout. If his listeners are here then I know I'm among good people.

[–] RedPander@lemmy.rogers-net.com 1 points 2 years ago

This. Pretty much as soon as he starting running for president there has been talk about illegal operations and trials. But nothing has ever come of it. Even if there's a 98% chance, I'll only really care once a sentence is handed out.

[–] monsterlynn@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm so over this game show host.

Why did anyone ever give a fuck about this guy?

He was a bottom of the barrel choice for a gameshow and was super lucky to get the Apprentice.

Any fuckstick could've taken that role and run with it

[–] FoolishBrainiac@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Apprentice did more to convince people he was a brilliant businessman than his work in business ever did.

[–] monsterlynn@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

I used to LOVE Celebrity Apprentice - - but I thought it was a ridiculous joke! I knew Trump was a loser in the businesses world for decades! And that stupid lookin hair and Long Island mobster taste level and way of speaking that he had... Then he'd roll out his dumb kids and they'd be all judgey and gloaty.

Could not believe other people took that seriously.

Part of me still doesn't.

[–] Kinbladez@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hey now. Calling him a game show host is diminishing his filmography significantly. He was also an extra in Home Alone 2.

[–] monsterlynn@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

True. He also appeared on Saturday Night Live several times. Definitely presidential material.

[–] Kinbladez@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Idk how many more qualifications you need, really.

[–] nodester@partizle.com 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The irony is that he is the one who signed a law making mishandling classified documents a felony.

[–] lightrush@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

This was too good to believe so I had to fact-check it. It's true.

[–] Clbull@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This and Boris Johnson resigning makes my dick hard.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nicholas@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Looking at this as non-partisan as I can... if Hillary wasn't convicted for essentially doing the exact same thing (and deleting the evidence...) then I really don't see any way for Trump to be convicted either.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

No evidence of Clinton's alleged misconduct was found. Plenty of evidence of Trump's was found. That's the difference.

Maybe it's because Clinton is innocent. Maybe it's because she did a better job covering her tracks. Who knows? Regardless, you need evidence to convict someone, and I hope I speak for us all when I say the alternative is much, much worse.

[–] nicholas@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

She willingly hid classified documents on a private server and wiped it with BeachBit so investigators couldn’t recover the evidence. Arguably that’s worse since she could also be charged with destruction of evidence. Come on now… either BOTH Hillary and Trump should be in prison or neither of them should be in prison. Any other interpretation is being willfully partisan.

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Arguably that’s worse since she could also be charged with destruction of evidence.

but like. she wasn't. she was investigated extensively--and that investigation probably cost her the presidency insofar as any singular thing can be blamed for her loss--and she wasn't. do you have a reasonable explanation for why she'd not be charged with these things if she was actually as damned as you're suggesting?

[–] nicholas@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because the FBI is very clearly politically motivated.

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (8 children)

i'm... sure you recognize that this is quite literally a case where the facts disagree with your personal feelings. i also i don't really know where we can go from here if your earnest belief is the FBI was "politically motivated" into clearing Hillary Clinton when it literally said her actions did not rise to the standard of criminality and again, their investigation may be the single biggest reasons she lost the presidency.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] HQC@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago

Why are even we talking about someone that was never President, is not running for President, and is not currently serving in public office?

Investigate and prosecute all criminals. That includes Trump, regardless of who else it also includes.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

You're making some very serious accusations there. Before we proceed, I'm going to need to see some equally serious proof.

[–] Kinbladez@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What she did is not at all "essentially doing the exact same thing". At all. I'm not saying she's not probably guilty of some crime at some point because most of our politicians are corrupt, but you are absolutely misinformed if you think she kept hundreds of classified documents, showed them off to people, and lied to federal investigators about it.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You're right... it's worse. She covered her tracks by deleting all the data then lying about it.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I assume you have evidence of this?

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago

you'd think if she actually did commit a crime the FBI would have actually charged and prosecuted her, considering they found the accusations so serious they essentially--unintentionally or intentionally, depending on how cynical you want to view this--interfered with a democratic election in publicly announcing they were investigating just days before the 2016 presidential election. and yet!

In May, the State Department's Office of the Inspector General released a report about the State Department's email practices, including Clinton's. In July, FBI director James Comey announced that the FBI investigation had concluded that Clinton had been "extremely careless" but recommended that no charges be filed because Clinton did not act with criminal intent, the historical standard for pursuing prosecution.[7]

A three-year State Department investigation concluded in September 2019 that 38 individuals were "culpable" in 91 instances of sending classified information that reached Clinton's email account, though it found "no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information".[15] Yet a September 2022 "Fact Checker" analysis by The Washington Post, which followed a tweet by Clinton claiming, "I had zero emails that were classified", also quotes the same 2019 State Department report as having noted, "None of the emails at issue in this review were marked as classified."[1]

[–] HQC@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago

She did not do "essentially the same thing" for multiple reasons.

  • The emails you're referring to were not classified and went through proper process to get permission to be removed.
  • Hillary has already been investigated and cleared, including investigations conducted by the Trump administration.
  • Trump was given multiple opportunities to return documents. He kept lying and keeping things even after saying they'd returned everything. There are still classified docs that haven't been found!
  • The nature of the material is orders of magnitude different. Nothing that Hillary has been accused of destroying or storing improperly, even if those accusations were all true, even begins to compare to the sensitivity and importance of the kind of information Trump was hoarding.
  • In addition to simply possessing the material he shouldn't and refusing to give it back, he also breached security by showing sensitive information to people that weren't allowed and, just at a practical level, has no reasonable need to see it in the first place.
[–] starrox@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Honestly, with all the shit this disgusting wannabe dictator has already gotten away with, I'll hold on to celebrations until there is some kind of definitive verdict.

And dont get me started on the sentence even IF they convict him for something. He's old, he's rich, he probably still has some buddies in higher places - I'd be absolutely surprised if he would go to a genpop prison. - Even though thats exactly what he would deserve the most.

[–] zhunk@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Charging him is still a big milestone, and setting the precedent that a former president can be charged is still important. But, yeah, sentencing will be the even bigger milestone.

[–] starrox@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

undefined> setting the precedent that a former president can be charged is still important

absolutely. It is already a win, but I believe the US really need the BIG win which would be to actually sentence him for the serious crimes he commited. Literally every other US citizen would be a prisoner long since for doing a microscopic part of what Trump did. The damage that one person did in 4 years, and not just locally in America but also internationally, is sheer unbelievable.

[–] thilo@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Sadly this is not Trumps achievement, but the rising hostility of a collapsing ecology coupled with late stage capitalism (read survival-of-the-fittest-mentality). We don't talk much about it but most people dying in the climate crisis wont die of heatstroke but by wars. It is a struggle to keep your humanity in the process. Sadly there are an increasing number of people who stop bothering.

/edit grammar

[–] starrox@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You say a lot of sad truths there.

Of course it is not Trumps responsibility that our planet goes to shit. That people get more alienated from each other in general. That hate and fear spread like wildfires while empathy and humanity is in short supply.

But what IS Trumps accomplishment is that he is responsible for giving all those hateful, ignorant people a voice. He normalized saying shit that you'd only dared to share in the company of a few close friends in the past. He normalized the complete lack of empathy towards adversaries. He normalized acting like a complete moron against all evidence. He normalized distrust in science. He normalized abusing a political responsibility for selfpromotion. ... I could go on.

But what is really grinding my gears behind that context is, that he normalized all that shit not only in the US, but basically worldwide due to the insane reach he had as US president. Parties in my home country are beginning to do exactly the same shit, not on full-removed level yet but we will get there.

/rant sorry

[–] thilo@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

He used and improved on the populists playbook. All the neofascists worldwide seem to have one shared toolbox. Whereas liberals have more individualistic worldviews than active participants :(

load more comments
view more: next ›