this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
622 points (88.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8270 readers
321 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RebelOne@lemm.ee 64 points 2 years ago (16 children)

My friends and I are all huge Bernie supporters. We still voted for Hillary. We weren't happy about it, but we voted. All the blame against Bernie supporters bothers me. It wasn't us... And to use Bernie as the scapegoat is hiding the real problems in the system and the idiotic choices the democratic party makes. She still won the popular vote. We voted. Gerrymandering sucks.

[–] SaltySalamander@lemmy.fmhy.ml -3 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Gerrymandering makes no difference in a presidential election.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The clumping of whole states into winner takes all buckets, and the way that can subvert the overall popular vote, is identical to the dynamic of the “gerrymandering” proper term usually used with regard to congressional districts. To correct someone like you just did requires ignoring the entire meaning of the word to uphold to a strict definition of the word.

[–] ira@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Even with a strict definition, gerrymandering is still absolutely a thing with presidential elections, with Dakota boundaries being drawn to break it into two states to give Republicans twice as many electoral votes.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)