this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
319 points (98.5% liked)

Firefox

18694 readers
84 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
319
Firefox 115 released (www.mozilla.org)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by hal_5700X@lemmy.world to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mojo@lemm.ee 77 points 2 years ago (19 children)

Certain Firefox users may come across a message in the extensions panel indicating that their add-ons are not allowed on the site currently open. We have introduced a new back-end feature to only allow some extensions monitored by Mozilla to run on specific websites for various reasons, including security concerns.

What is this bullshit? Feel like this will lead to adblocks being blocked for certain websites under the guise of "security", aka: we don't have to justify shit to you.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

“Security concerns” is such a bullshit reason. If an add on is such a security concern, why host it in the first place?

I’m disappointed Mozilla is going down this path, but not surprised.

[–] NRoach44@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So allowing any random, possibly compromised, possibly installed by malware, add-on to run during the Firefox account login pages (see the list of URLs in this thread) isn't a security concern to you?

[–] Contend6248@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago

The alternative would be to give addons so little permission that the damage wouldn't matter. Effectively break the whole system, i'm fine with the ignore list.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)