this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
732 points (80.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

36180 readers
1647 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Even if we take into consideration that 90% (out of 25) could be lying (they aren't), that's still ~3 women he assaulted.

Edit: Damn y'all, thanks for that old internet feeling I keep coming back to Lemmy for. Not a girl in sight in these comments.

Is testifying under oath not considered evidence? There have been so many credible lawsuits against this guy for sexual assault. Honestly what are these files going to prove that we don't already have plenty of evidence for?

And lastly, do you have any idea what going after a rich powerful man for sexually assaulting you does to your life? Why the fuck would anybody put themselves through that if they weren't absolutely sure they had a credible case? Some of the plaintiffs in these cases had their lives and their family's lives threatened and disrupted.

Welp, to the bottom with me I suppose.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 152 points 1 day ago (73 children)

Ah, yes, ye Olde "just believe them" attitude.

No one would ever lie for personal gain, right?

I don't "believe" claims that have significant impact - that requires evidence. Which is the basis of our legal system.

Just wait till you've been wrongfully accused about something and have to stand before a judge. It's no fun, and you'll be grateful then that evidence is required.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (12 children)

"Just believe them" is shorthand for "Believe them long enough to actually press charges and hold a trial instead of dismissing them by default".

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Yeah, I think a lot of people are completely missing the point. Very similar to how saying "black lives matter" doesn't imply that non-black lives do not matter, or that black lives must somehow be considered more important than any other life, the phrase "believe women" doesn't imply that we should start doubting men, or that a woman's testimony should be held as a higher form of evidence than anything else. It's pointing out the clear systemic bias against women in a system controlled and dominated mostly by men who do not want to cede their power and authority.

One of the many flaws of the English language is how difficult it is to condense a very complex sociopolitical message down into a catchy one-liner without losing a ton of the context that got people there in the first place.

[–] Bubbey@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wasn't BLM just a scam to extract money for its operators?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (69 replies)