this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
732 points (80.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

36180 readers
1647 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Even if we take into consideration that 90% (out of 25) could be lying (they aren't), that's still ~3 women he assaulted.

Edit: Damn y'all, thanks for that old internet feeling I keep coming back to Lemmy for. Not a girl in sight in these comments.

Is testifying under oath not considered evidence? There have been so many credible lawsuits against this guy for sexual assault. Honestly what are these files going to prove that we don't already have plenty of evidence for?

And lastly, do you have any idea what going after a rich powerful man for sexually assaulting you does to your life? Why the fuck would anybody put themselves through that if they weren't absolutely sure they had a credible case? Some of the plaintiffs in these cases had their lives and their family's lives threatened and disrupted.

Welp, to the bottom with me I suppose.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 33 points 1 day ago (7 children)

When people have sex, they usually do it in private, without any witnesses. Whatever happens during that time is often difficult to prove afterward, since it typically comes down to one person’s word against the other’s. Unless there’s clear physical evidence of assault, it can be extremely hard to establish that something was done against someone’s will. Most reasonable people would agree that “she said so” alone doesn’t amount to proof - and isn’t, by itself, a valid basis for sending someone to prison.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Whatever happens during that time is often difficult to prove afterward

"Listen, you were in an alley and nobody was around, so how do we know you weren't handing over the wallet voluntarily?"

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

What are you suggesting exactly? You have an actual solution here to offer or you just want to be a smart ass?

[–] Bubbey@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

He wants cops to sit in a cuck chair and observe every sexual encounter to ensure no funny business. He'll also have a little retail iPad where you do an esignature for consent before starting.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)