this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
452 points (99.6% liked)

LGBTQ+

3148 readers
387 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RymrgandsDaughter@lemmy.world 34 points 21 hours ago (9 children)

Tolerance doesn't exist for groups that are naturally intolerant, it's hilarious that they expect to be treated differently than they've sued and abused the system to be allowed to do to others

[–] zeropublix@lemmy.ml 17 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

It’s called the paradox of tolerance. This graphic explains it pretty well:

paradox of tolerance

[–] _core@sh.itjust.works 15 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Tolerance is not a moral trait, despite how the right tries to portray it as one. Tolerance is part of the social contract, if one side is intolerant, they've broken the social contract and abdicated any claim for the rules of society to apply to them.

[–] Noizth@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I always saw it as like a ceasefire, They break it then we start shooting. Because to me "I tolerate you" doesn't mean that I like you or have you in good regards. Go tell someone you love "I tolerate you" and I'm pretty sure you are gona have a lengthy conversation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)