this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
225 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

66783 readers
4849 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fieryhamster@lemmy.world 83 points 12 hours ago (17 children)

Countdown until Trump stupidly bans it as it "harms" President Musk.

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 11 hours ago (16 children)

...

biden basically did that already. ever noticed there are no byds on the road in the us?

i seem to recall it wasn't an outright ban, but unreasonable tariffs on chinese evs specifically. a soft ban, but enough to be as effective.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 23 points 11 hours ago (15 children)

The official reason for tariffs is government subsidy AFAIK, but in reality the moment they lower the tariffs, US and EU automobile industry is done.

[–] Enelop@lemm.ee 16 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

The heavy subsidy by the Chinese government is the reason they would dominate though. The tariffs won’t ever be lifted unless they stop manipulating the prices to be lower than domestic competitors…

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 10 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

They would dominate because they make a good product that isn’t more expensive than it has to be. US car companies have discontinued most affordable options to try and force people to only buy larger, higher end vehicles that most people have no use for. Now they’re mad that international companies are willing to sell the products they refuse to.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, usa car companies are bitches. But it is laughable that you think the reason it isn't more expensive has nothing to do with being subsidized

[–] Enelop@lemm.ee 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The reason it is vastly less expensive is due to being subsidized. You don’t seem to understand what is being said and can be backed by facts.

Allowing your local industries to be dominate is common sense. As much as china is smart to subsidize theirs so heavily, the united states isn't wrong to tariff them

[–] Enelop@lemm.ee -4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

And not the 3.2 billion that the government dumped into them…

I’ve heard they are good cars but the price is manipulated.

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

so... how much did does the us government give its auto industry?

They gave us auto companies 81 billion between 2008 and 2014, and continue to subsidize the industry to this day.

pot meet kettle

[–] Enelop@lemm.ee 1 points 55 minutes ago

Yet we don’t try to sell into the Chinese market for the express purpose of undercutting their domestic product. It’s common sense to not allow that to happen.

[–] SnortsGarlicPowder@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

BYD recieved 3.7 billion between 2018-2022 2.2 billion in 2022 alone.

Ford recieved under 500 million in 2022 but did recieve 1.7 billion in 2023.

Ford motor apparently has recieved 7.7 billion in subsidies since the year 2000. Usually from states rather than fedrally.

[–] shades@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 4 hours ago

The heavy subsidy by the Chinese government is the reason they would dominate though.

¡Waaaah bad mon China letting people get around with cars and public transit!

/s

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

They aren’t manipulating, shits just cheaper to make over there. So they can make more profit and still charge less.

[–] Enelop@lemm.ee 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Read your own source maybe?

For its part, China has declared the EU subsidy probe a protectionist maneuver by Europe, saying that its automakers are winning because they make better products. Of course, even the study’s author say that the rapid adoption of green tech in Europe in particular is due in large part to cheap goods coming from China.

The source is also a German investigation? So it may not even be entirely factual either dude…

[–] Enelop@lemm.ee 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I’d trust Germany over China any day and twice on Sunday…

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Okay, and factually their labor and parts are cheap. Your own source even says that this a major factor.

And you do realize every country subsidizes auto makers yeah? How much did the USA and EU countries do in same time frame…?

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)