this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
68 points (91.5% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

846 readers
182 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

This one is both upsetting and weird.

So there was a user on ponder.cat who's been spamming posts. Like a lot. 58 per day, on average. Not 58 comments. 58 posts.

I started seeing a little scattering of reports about it, mostly just figured it was the mods' business to deal with, and then finally today I actually really took a look at what they were doing and realized it was way over the top. Pretty much everyone in the comments agreed when someone brought it up.

A 25 day old account with 1,400+ posts? What the actual fuck? My entire goddamn feed is this one account...

Touch grass. Good lord. You're carpet bombing multiple communities with repeats of the same crap.

The user was not receptive.

lol.

I guess people here do not know how to block an account.

:)

Is that a compliment or a rant?

May I introduce you to Lemmy block function.

If you don’t like my posts then block me and you will never see them again. As simple as that.

That's a bunch of bullshit. The voting was about as you would expect. I said to the user:

That's not how it works. If you're interfering with the average Lemmy user's experience, you don't get to claim it doesn't count because each individual person would be able to block each individual problematic account, if they wanted to have a good experience. Honestly, these people have a point. You have been posting an average of 58 posts per day. That's too much. I post a ton, and that's about 10 times more than me, and I've gotten multiple complaints about posting too much in particular communities. The handful of times it's happened, my reaction was "Oh my bad what sounds like an acceptable level" and then to more or less stick to an acceptable level. Getting snarky with people who are asking you to cool it is very bad. Please stop posting so much. Anything about 10-15 posts per day starts to feel really excessive to me. Definitely don't be dismissive about people's complaints to you about it.

They rejected my suggestion, so I sent them a DM that was a little more direct about it: Stop doing this if you want to keep your account on my instance.

Then, for some reason, they deleted their account on their own.

Well, that was weird, but at least it's all resolved and we can all get back to what we were doing. Or wait... what's happening now?

I wasn't expecting "making sure we make a safe space for the spammers by banning people who complain about spam" to be an important moderation duty, but I guess in the bizarro world that is !news@lemmy.world moderation philosophy, it makes perfect sense.

https://lemmy.world/modlog/1347

@Ghyste@sh.itjust.works

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 27 points 1 day ago (19 children)

Yep. That user is formerly:

And probably more. I was only paying attention since Dot, but I recognized the pattern retroactively for the two "101" accounts.

They post a LOT of stuff back to back, mostly "offbrand" news and blogs pretending to be news. They also start slipping in the propaganda news as well (as you pointed out). When they get called out, they delete their account with content removal set to true.

Now that you've called them out, expect them to nuke their account and all content soon. That's their standard play. They'll be back in a day or two with a brand new account on a different instance and starting the pattern all over.

FWIW, I locally banned their current alt (Cat) as soon as it popped up after they deleted their 000 one and started back with the same pattern. They leave a lot of abandoned comments in their wake which turns into database clutter and inaccessible conversations.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 14 points 1 day ago (17 children)

Makes perfect sense. Yeah, some people told me about them and I kind of left it alone, for overly long I guess in retrospect. They weren't as bad the last time I had looked at them.

The more interesting question is, why are the lemmy.world mods coming out swinging for this user?

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Can't answer that, but it's possible they're simply not aware of their alt history. There's a similarly active user, Microwave, but they're legit; they always post quality stuff with no agenda. Perhaps they're giving "Cat" the benefit of doubt? They also give several other controversial posters a lot of leeway (won't mention them, but you probably already know the handful I'm referring to). Not suggesting any kind of agenda with the LW mods; just seems like they're trying a bit too hard to be "fair and balanced".

This user nukes their accounts, so unless one is familiar with the patterns of their previous accounts, it's difficult to correlate them with no history available. If they're on your instance and you have concerns about them (and they haven't self-destructed yet), you might be ahead to just ban them ahead of time (w/o content removal) so there's record for later comparison.

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You hit it on the head. We weren't aware of this user, as we had 0 reports about them until today.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 9 points 1 day ago

Open up your report queue, switch to all, search for "mandates created in the last presidency".

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)