this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
53 points (94.9% liked)
United States | News & Politics
7969 readers
92 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Not exactly free of bias? Lmao. The BBC was seen last week decrying their loss of funding from USAID and y'all still cite it as a reliable source. It's a propaganda rag filled to the brim with tory mouthpieces.
It was the most widely observed election in the world, and multiple parties not currently trying to colonize Venezuela declared their election perfectly legitimate. What's more, US observers outside the State Dept deny any fraudulence. As per usual, gringos gladly apply the Trump playbook (or rather, he took it from US foreign policy), lie lie lie, and if you lose anyway, say it was stolen.
https://noticiaalminuto.com/como-funcionan-las-actas-electorales-y-como-verificar-su-autenticidad-en-venezuela/
https://www.laprensagrafica.com/internacional/Como-funcionan-las-actas-electorales-en-Venezuela-y-como-verificar-su-autenticidad-20240731-0083.html
https://ecuadorenvivo.com/blog/2024/08/01/como-funcionan-las-actas-electorales-en-venezuela-y-como-verificar-su-autenticidad/
Just in case you don't like bbc
That's literally a BBC cable reposted on three different sites lmao. Didn't you think it was weird that three sites from different countries had the same headline and content?
I stg you libs don't even fucking read. The content of the article is also just the opposition swearing they won. No shit, that's what every US puppet says, the fact of the matter is international observers not aligned with the US ratified the election. Fabricated claims aren't true until proven false. Cope.
Where are the real ballot papers then?