this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
53 points (94.9% liked)
United States | News & Politics
7969 readers
92 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This article is making it seem like maduro actually won the elections with democracy, and that's not what happened at all. Yes, the CNE "confirmed the victory of Maduro", but they're controlled by the same people in this corrupt government, so that doesn't prove a thing. People from the votong polls collected the papers that provide information about the votes per political party, and it shows a clear win for the opposition. Both sources provided in this article about the election in venezuela come from the same website, which isn't exactly clear of bias.
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/08/02/americas/venezuelas-tally-sheets-intl-latam/index.html
https://www.bbc.com/mundo/articles/cjl6j83zwklo
Please take into account maduro forbid Maria Corina Machado from taking part in the election process.
https://elpais.com/america/2024-01-26/el-supremo-de-venezuela-confirma-la-inhabilitacion-de-maria-corina-machado-para-concurrir-en-las-elecciones-presidenciales.html
Are you using one sided propaganda rags as reference to uphold your ideation of legitimate elections, when all international watch credited them as legitimate? Where is the anti-capitalist party in the US or most EU countries who have legitimate elections?
What international watch? The government didn't allow any official international watch. Can you show sources?