this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
185 points (97.0% liked)
Technology
73232 readers
4142 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is a zero-day bug though?
It's not, the title lies.
Read the article
I did.. It looks like the bug has been exploited for a couple of weeks now, with a patch only being released on 20th of July? That makes it zero-day
Edit: realised we might have different definition of zero day. Depends whether you consider that the vendor didn't know about the issue, or there isn't a patch available upon exploitation of the vulnerability.
Zero day is typically defined as there being zero days since the vulnerability is known to the developer, in other words, it being unknown at the time of the exploit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-day_vulnerability?wprov=sfla1
Ah thank you. I thought zero day and 1 day vulnerabilities were: 0-day = vulnerability is not known to the vendor and so there is no patch. If exploited, it is a 0-day attack. 1-day = vulnerability is known and patch is available, but not all systems are patched.
I.E. the actual number of days doesn't matter.