ipitco

joined 1 week ago
[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 1 points 1 week ago (7 children)

How does it compare to tesla in terms of privacy, ownership (DRM) and stuff?

[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 1 points 1 week ago

It ends up more as an opinion circlejerk than a safe space.

When you ban people disagreeing with you, you're not making anyone feel safer, you're just comforting yourself in a confirmation bias group where only one voice can be heard

When you ban people by stating they're transphobic when they're not, you're being authoritarian and misleading. It ends up with active misinformation because either you're with them, or you must fuck off. A sect.

When the concept of a safe space goes from no judgment and kindness to a political space, I believe it will have a negative impact.

But maybe it's just me being pissed off at the abusive moderation

[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Income inequalities don't implicitly imply a hierarchy in terms of authority over other people

Anarchism mainly rejects the state's hierarchy. It doesn't make it left or right

Also knowing that left and right will often rely on the state to push their ideas and rules

[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

both are often linked

Enforcing your opinion while banning people not agreeing is pretty authoritarian to me

[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

blahaj is authoritarian. Them not liking tankies doesn't mean they're not the exact same with their ideas. Ada is a perfect example of this.

!196@lemmy.world doesn't exist for no reason

[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 1 points 1 week ago (7 children)
[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 3 points 1 week ago

Why would you always assume the worse? That's a great way to get offended at anything and to easily censor people while only giving your narrative

[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

It's not lemmy, it's just how the fediverse works to prevent double voting

Mastodon also being on ActivityPub, that's really likely the same thing, except maybe not implemented in the UI, but that could be accessed by the API or in the DB

[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

for db0 it might be as frankly I don't know, it was just a feeling that I have, that they're more open towards liberalism

But for blahaj, up left seems like the correct spot

Woke, pro freedom of gender/identity, progressive; so most of the time left

Authoritarian, huge voice, strict on voicing their opinions and rules on the subject. You either agree or you're banned. So authoritarian

[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (12 children)

To each their own I guess

Downvoting posts in the All feed isn’t that bad, as it reduces their visibility if you believe it doesn’t interest you at all and probably ~~most~~ won’t interest many other people, so you let a chance to other posts to show up

Edit: typo

[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yea for sure

I believe most "vote manipulation" bans aren’t really on that case though

It’s mostly "you strongly disagree with us? Fuck you!"

view more: ‹ prev next ›