TowardsTheFuture

joined 2 years ago
[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago (7 children)

No. The party not being sold should be able to void the contract if they want at that time. It should not automatically be voided. I could just make contracts saying I’ll pay you 1 trillion over 5 years, get whatever from you, then sell my company to void it so I don’t have to pay, uphold my end, or etc.

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 12 points 5 days ago

I mean what a wrong headline. They found that most payments simply did not fill out what the payment was for in the cell as it is optional. It means they can’t read what it was for directly without asking, not that no one knows where the money went.

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So have you tried pressing enter or did you click the top thing under the URL bar dropdown that said “google search result” cuz uhhhhhh

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Thanks for the recommendation!

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago

I'm sorry... she sounds sexist because when she talked about the article on her at nasa she mentioned..... her dreams.... her being raised poor..... her being homeless.... and.... her getting a job at Nasa despite all that. Huh oh wait weird I missed the part where she made it all about her being a woman? because... she didn't even do that? She wasn't even highlighting that she is important as a role model to women in STEM. Didn't even mention it in the part discussing the article that was erased. She was highlighting being a role model of achieving her dream job even though she was poor and homeless at one point. And was simply pointing out that it is being erased BECAUSE she is a woman. and you are calling HER sexist? Are you high? Can you read? You just enter a fugue state when you see the word women and make shit up that didn't happen so you can feel better about yourself? Cuz I'm super confused how you can get sexist from what she said without just assuming she's sexist because she is a woman.

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because destabilizing mexico so we have an influx of cheap labor has been the point since we were building fucking railroads.

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

basically, old admin flaked out, but psyched out current admins thinking they would be able to get domain access to prevent this, so they did not finish developing their plan for when this happened.

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Their tuta email already is post quantum so it’s not that they can’t do the security part. Idk honestly, it’s probably just the logistics of getting a lot more servers if they’re trying to make a secure cloud. I just know they posted they’ll be developing that in the future 2 years ago, now would be a great time for it to release as an alternative.

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wait what I’m sitting here using Memmy lol. I guess I should move on? Why is it dead?

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

1gb or 5gb for $5 a month is kinda rough tho, as a heads up to anyone looking, it is there more as a means to encrypted collaboration, not large storage and sharing of files.

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Thanks. Made the swap to Tuta as it’s the only thing I haven’t moved away from Google yet. See Tuta mention 2 years ago they’re making a drive alternative but… that’s still not a thing. Kinda sad would definitely like that.

view more: next ›