this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
1047 points (99.2% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

41064 readers
557 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 245 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is Vital Proteins brilliant response to being taken to court over heavy metal and "foreign materials" contamination in their products.

[–] Brunette6256@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Do you have any supporting links? I saw a reddit post saying something similar but I cant find a real article or support. Either way I am returning the product.

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 149 points 1 day ago (5 children)

https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/prop65/complaints/2017-02480C5316.pdf

Found searching ‘“vital proteins” lawsuit’

Sued by an environmental nonprofit for failing to warn about the presence of lead and heavy metals as required by CA law. They settled.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Found searching ‘“vital proteins” lawsuit’

that's just cheating

[–] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 19 hours ago

In the ’20s tho? Not rly

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 74 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There's an easy solution: keep buying it, break the seal to get to the message, then return it. Have your friends do the same, at the same store. Pretty soon that product will be gone and you can move on to the next store.

If the store starts to bitch about it, you can claim that you wanted to see if the statement had been removed.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 107 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Add to this the fact they try to enforce mandatory arbitration - a thing that shouldn't ever exist to begin with, in any jurisdiction, and is actually unenforceable in many.

[–] lauha@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (3 children)

In most of Europe, no contract can take away legal rights

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Same in the USA, but that doesn't mean they won't try.

[–] musky_occultist@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure forced arbitration is in fact legal and enforceable in the US (at least for the most part? I am not a lawyer)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Strider@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

This, and contract details that are shown after opening the packaging (as seen here covered by the lid) are void.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It doesn't matter if you can't afford the lawsuit.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Part4@infosec.pub 54 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Is there a bigger red flag than a message on it saying 'if you break this seal you can't sue us!'

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Forced Arbitration should be illegal everywhere.

[–] catty@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] vxx@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Delevoping liver issues, that's what it is.

aka Protein powder

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Ah! That's one of the worst parts of the internet, and they've figured out a way to make it real.

At least they mention the arbitration upfront, I guess.

[–] TheCleric@lemmy.org 53 points 1 day ago

I hope you returned that shit. That’s not mildly infuriating, that’s capitalism has officially run amok and needs to be taken out back and shot in the head

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 91 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Would love to see them try and enforce whatever EULA they wrote up.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They’ll drag out any legal challenge in hopes you won’t want to pay for months of legal fees fighting it, on top of whatever legal fees are incurred that caused you to challenge it in the first place…

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sometimes mandatory arbitration doesn't work out so well for companies either as Valve found out. When they run into what are effectively class action lawsuits but they get forced into individual arbitration with hundreds of thousands of people that clause starts to look really dumb.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This isn't mildly annoying, this is corporate hellscape.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

Write on the money you used to purchase this by accepting this money you agree to the terms of service...

Eat shit turdblossoms.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 day ago

Open it from the bottom.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago

That's concerning.

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Holy shit. How does this not just reduce their sales to 0?

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Well, the purchase is probably already made by the time this is seen, and for those who see it, they probably just ignore it similarly to EULA popups when installing programs.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Interesting how we've all become accustomed to the notion that "agreeing to arbitration" has just become "waving your consumer rights" and no lawmaker is pushing to have that fixed.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

A good attorney could argue that drilling a hole in the side of the carton does not constitute opening the package.

load more comments (3 replies)

At the board meeting, I want to hear when they decided to broadcast that they're expecting to get sued, but in a really cute way

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›