this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
928 points (98.7% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

7612 readers
610 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

And then get weirdly surprised and entitled about it when someone does do something about it.

[–] Dr_Box@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (3 children)

Where I live almost everyone assumes you are a right wing Christian. They don't even take into consideration that you're not and if they figure out you aren't they stop talking to you in most cases. I've never had anyone straight up call me an idiot but I've had good friends freeze up when they found out and then start avoiding me afterwards. You get looked at like a lizard in human skin.

To add to this, I've heard the talk that gets passed around before they found out that I wasnt. If you are a woman they will straught up call you a witch

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 1 points 47 seconds ago

I’m a passing trans guy, and where I live is like this.

It’s just fucked walking around and know that if they knew, I would essentially lose all humanity to them. It happened with my divorce lawyer, it happens with doctors. I’m like an alien hiding in the place I was born.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 1 points 14 minutes ago* (last edited 13 minutes ago)

Christianity (and all religions imo) are a fucking stain on humanity

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 1 points 42 minutes ago

That is so strange. Where i live if someone under the age of 70 tells you that they are actual christian, the reaction is usually: "wait what? Really now?

[–] SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

As opposed to the rest of the world, where we simply never release a thing, at all.

[–] nthavoc@lemmy.today 11 points 11 hours ago

World Champions in sports that only the US participates in. I am not a fan of football, both the "footy" version or the "NFL" but it's always been odd to me that winners of the Super Bowl, or equivalent event, are often declared "World Champions" of their own league in an event exclusively hosted in the US.

[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 19 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

for me it's the whole "don't tread on me" and gun culture rhetoric. Americans seem to be "don't push me" but when they actually get pushed they're all "uWu please more daddy" it's odd.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago

Yes, that whole thing went from defending guns in schools to nothing burger in a matter of seconds.

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I can explain this one. Growing up in America, you're constantly told that you're a patriot simply because you were born here—like just existing in the same country where Jefferson, Franklin, and Washington lived 250 years ago somehow makes you part of their legacy. It's pushed on you so early and so hard that you don't even question it. You just go to school, and the first thing you do is stand and pledge allegiance to the state—together, as a group. It’s ritualistic. It functions like a cult mechanism. That’s how it gets ingrained.

Most Americans do not have an understanding that they are being tread on.

[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago

ah got you. so it's like "you're supposed to behave this way" it's ingrained in you as a child that this is the proper thing to do but like most kids you just have no idea why it is and you just go along with it. like being dragged to church as a kid.

[–] frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world 14 points 19 hours ago (6 children)
  • Gun culture
  • Making houses out of wood. To me, someone from a country where houses are made of brick, this is like living in a shed. Also, the USA is the hotspot of tornadoes, so it makes even less sense
  • One of the richest countries in the world, and universal healthcare isn't a thing
[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 1 points 41 minutes ago

Houses of woods aren't really bad or the problem, but houses of wood that are held together by osb and cardboard is odd.

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Making houses out of wood.

This is fine. Lumber was historically plentiful in North America, and lumber houses last just as long as stone or brick.

Lumber has several advantages over stone/concrete/brick:

  • Less CO2 impact from construction activities. Concrete production is a huge contributor to atmospheric CO2.
  • Greater sustainability in general. Concrete is approaching a global sand shortage, because most sand in the world doesn't have the right qualities to be included in concrete.
  • Better energy efficiency and insulation properties. Brick homes need double walls in order to compete with the insulation properties of a wood framed house that naturally has voids that can be filled with insulation.
  • Better resilience against seismic events and vibrations (including nearby construction). The west coast has frequent earthquakes, and complying with seismic building code with stone/masonry requires it to be reinforced with steel. The state of Utah, where trees and lumber are not as plentiful as most other parts of North America, and where seismic activity happens, has been replacing unreinforced masonry for 50+ years now.
  • Easier repair. If a concrete foundation cracks, that's easier to contain and mitigate in a wood-framed house than a building with load-bearing concrete or masonry.

Some Northern European and North American builders are developing large scale timber buildings, including timber skyscrapers. The structural engineers and safety engineers have mostly figured out how to engineer those buildings to be safe against fire and tornadoes.

It's not inherently better or worse. It's just different.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 13 points 17 hours ago

A brick home wouldn’t withstand a tornado either. Like if a tree hits a brick house it would do significant damage to the house. And most brick houses still have a timber roof under the roof tiles so even a small tornado could lift the roof off the house.

Here is a brick house hit by a small tornado in England

Reinforced concrete is a much better material for a hurricane and tornado resistant building. Also shape of the house is important. A dome would be the best.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Living here, I will tell you that the insistence on building houses in a neo-colonial style in tornado alley, hurricane prone areas, or in a middle of a yearly flood plane, baffles me. We should have completely different architectural styles adpated to withstand the elements at this point. You know, what housing is supposed to be for in the first place? /rant

[–] Patches@ttrpg.network 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

As always it comes down to $$$.

I live in Florida, our building codes didn't tighten up until hurricanes cost everyone everything, and now Miami Dade in particular has some of the strictest building code in the US.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

A wood-framed house isn't necessarily weaker than a brick house.

Wood is pliable and doesn't suddenly crumble and collapse when it's stressed. And it weighs WAY less when it does fail.

If you're in a tornado or earthquake, would you rather be trapped beneath 120 pounds of sheetrock, insulation, and shingles or a 2 tons of broken, jagged rock?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, as I live in a very geologically active area, I'd rather not be crushed by 3 tons of brick falling in on me from the slightest earthquake. I'll take my wobbly wooden house.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

1 ton of tree feels a lot like 3 tons of brick.

[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 5 points 17 hours ago

Next week on Mythbusters, we crush Jamie with tons of various materials. You won't want to miss it!

[–] plyth@feddit.org 5 points 17 hours ago

That it spreads globally even though everybody else looks down on it and calls Americans dumb. It makes sense considering that it's the most consumer oriented but it's still weird.

[–] DJDarren@sopuli.xyz 100 points 1 day ago (3 children)

From my outside perspective, it's the pledge of allegiance.

Do you really have your kids stand up every morning and swear an oath to your flag? That's some real cult shit.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 14 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I had a teacher in elementary school that taught us that when a flag falls on the floor, you’re supposed to kiss it.

Yes, seriously.

It was just part of the normal flag-worship we were ~~taught~~ brainwashed with.

[–] Booboofinget@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I was taught that if a flag falls on the floor you are supposed to burn it.

[–] Patches@ttrpg.network 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That is "flag law" but you also aren't allowed to display the flag on a T-shirts, in any disrespectful manner, or a fuckin pick up truck and yet. here we are...

[–] Booboofinget@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Let's not even get into flag shorts and bikinis.

[–] ChexMax@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Hey! There's nothing more patriotic than making people horny for America

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Nothing could be more American than that pledge: it was something that was first propagated by a flag company that was trying to sell more flags.

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

"In 1891, Daniel Sharp Ford, the owner of the Youth's Companion, hired Bellamy to work with Ford's nephew James B. Upham in the magazine's premium department. In 1888, the Youth's Companion had begun a campaign to sell US flags to public schools as a premium to solicit subscriptions. For Upham and Bellamy, the flag promotion was more than merely a business move; under their influence, the Youth's Companion became a fervent supporter of the schoolhouse flag movement, which aimed to place a flag above every school in the nation. Four years later, by 1892, the magazine had sold US flags to approximately 26,000 schools. By this time the market was slowing for flags but was not yet saturated."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Sigh. Where to start...?

and I'm American

load more comments
view more: next ›