this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
363 points (97.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

12645 readers
1076 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Naich@lemmings.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not sure how useful it is to make comparisons like this anyway. Drivers and cyclists break different laws, some of which are more dangerous than others. Speeding and close passes in vehicles are far more dangerous than cyclists going on a red-that's-about-to-change where they can see that there's nothing coming.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What I find weird is why do cyclists break the law the same amount when they have so much more to lose? I run a red in my car, another car hits me, maybe a minor injury but I likely walk away. I run a red on my bike, a car hits me, I’m fucking dead or at least laid out. As a biker you have more incentive to obey every law all the time.

[–] MicrowavedTea@infosec.pub 14 points 1 week ago

If the infrastructure/driving conditions are bad enough you run almost the same danger when driving lawfully. Eventually you learn to trust your senses more than traffic laws. Sometimes it's actually safer to break some laws as a pedestrian/cyclist. Maybe people who ride a lot get used to it eventually and don't see running a red light (when no cars are passing) as more dangerous than going on green.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Fuck cars and up with cycling and bike infrastructure and all that but unless this study is more specific than the article states, it's useless. And if it is more specific this article may be misleading.

It just gives a percentage of "in compliance with traffic laws" and doesn't give a breakdown of what laws. Since most drivers speed at least a little quite often, and most cyclists are incapable of speeding anywhere near as much, what laws are the cyclists breaking to get them as low on compliance as drivers? If it's stop signs and red lights, that is right in line with the stereotype of them being dangerous scofflaws the article is saying this study shows is incorrect.

[–] Ileftreddit@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The only time I’ve seen a cyclist stop for a red light is when I stare them down while crossing the bike lane with my small child. Rest of the time it’s tally ho motherfuckers. NYC specifically

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This seems right for NYC, in that I see both bikes and cars frequently running through reds and riding where they aren't supposed to be

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

When I visited my friends in NYC they had a rule about 2 wheelers not stopping but 4 wheelers will stop. I was only there a few days but crossing the bike lane when I had the right of way as a pedestrian was scarier than crossing the street.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh 4 wheelers don't stop half the time. You have to lock eyes with the driver and assert dominance as a pedestrian so they understand that you will sue them for everything they're worth if they touch you.

To give you an idea of NYC drivers, I almost got run over once by a guy flooring it in reverse out of a one way side street, turning sharply onto the pedestrian crossing. We flipped each other off then he sped off

I see you've never been hit by a truck.

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think that depends on country...

"Cyclists should give way to pedestrians on shared use cycle tracks and to horse riders on bridleways." - nope, you hear a bell you dodge as they're not slowing down. Happens every time I use a shared path.

"Only pedestrians may use the pavement. Pedestrians include wheelchair and mobility scooter users." - nope, we get plenty mounting the pavement illegally; again, you hear a bell and you dodge. Happens 1--2 times a day on my trip to work.

I reckon people in a hurry just bend the rules more readily than people taking their time.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes. Even accounting for those idiots, car drivers still break more traffic laws. And it's exponentially more dangerous when they do. This is what the article is getting at.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

not a high bar to pass though

[–] Camzing@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How could they? There are WAY more traffic laws for cars.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›