this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
471 points (89.6% liked)

Privacy

39971 readers
330 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I know there are plenty of software missing from here. This is just a fun infographic I made, no need to take it seriously :)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 5 days ago

OP would not recognize a threat model if it bit him in the ass.

[–] spv@lemmy.spv.sh 24 points 6 days ago (2 children)

where's the shovel and double-ziplocs to bury your cash, silver, gold, platinum, and palladium? or the zippo to burn your prints off? get on my level, ho

[–] Charger8232@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 days ago

You may be interested in this infographic instead ;)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 12 points 6 days ago

I'll go further than this and say that true security is where everybody has support enough to not want to steal your shit, hack you etc.

Yeah corporations and governments are still a problem, for now, but both of the above parties would be far more secure if they did mutual aid, supported progrms to help the impoverished etc etc.

Basically having a collective approach to security and not such a myopic individualistic one.

[–] lock@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

How is iCloud not secure or privacy focused? You make no sense with this list. iOS is insanely secure compared to stock android.

[–] KiwiTB@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What's with the diss on Malwarebytes?

[–] Charger8232@lemmy.ml 19 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

Mainly because it's proprietary, privacy invasive by nature, and invasive on computers.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It’s also a shit product riding on marketing laurels from its past glory days, like Norton. It leaves pieces behind that can cause malware to come roaring back.

It isn’t hard to just nuke a system or restore a backup people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 days ago

They're taking it too seriously lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] _LordMcNuggets_@feddit.org 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Charger8232@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

A tool to slow down web crawlers (instead of making you solve captcha puzzles)

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Anubis is so lightweight you'll forget it's there until you look at your hosting bill.

I don't know if they realize this is implying it's onerously expensive, lol.

That amused me, too.

I think it plays fine for the intended audience, though.

For the folks looking into Anubis, that line plays well - because hosting costs are driven up by the kinds of spam bot visits that Anubis slows down.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

What's nuts is that what made Anubis' author go down that path was Amazon Bot (I remember precisely because they are the bot that also blew up my logs and thus forced me to take action against LLM scrappers) and... a significant share of the Web is hosted on AWS. So... Amazon is actually probably MAKING money by scrapping, no matter how inefficiently. I already hated Amazon but this is even worst than I imagined. It's probably not by design, to be fair, but it's also probably not something they'll invest into "fixing" as it's making them money. What an absolute human centipede situation.

load more comments
view more: next ›