this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
38 points (91.3% liked)
Firefox
20363 readers
69 users here now
/c/firefox
A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.
Rules
1. Adhere to the instance rules
2. Be kind to one another
3. Communicate in a civil manner
Reporting
If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They're trying way too hard?
No, they are literally not. Blocking VPN users is literally the low effort thing to do because the rate of problematic attacks and similar high effort issues coming from those IPs is much higher than the few legitimate users using VPNs are worth.
It's like blocking IP addresses when most people have dynamic IPs. It looks like you're being hard on people and doing lots, but in reality, you're just harming innocent users.
But that is the point. Most people do not use VPNs, you harm very few legitimate customers and save yourself the headache of dealing with all those who use VPNs for scams, attacks, exploits,...
The trade-off is entirely different from dynamic IPs.
Also, the admins running those things don't do stuff to look like they are doing things, they wouldn't care if you use a VPN if there was no downside to treating VPN IPs like any other.
I disagree, there's many legitimate reasons to run VPNs. Even if said users are few in number, they shouldn't be assumed to be dodgy.
is deezer a "justifiable" (or, in your words, legitimate) use of a vpn?
:/
deezer prolly use 200 shit tons 3rd party services. so yeah.
then don't use deezer