this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
364 points (98.7% liked)

Firefox

20363 readers
69 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 105 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Kind of wish they would stop trying to push this as "editing".

If all you can do is draw on top of it, you're not actually editing it.

I'm not shaming them, I understand why they can't have a full built-in PDF editor, but people that don't know any better are going to open it up expecting an actual editor and be disappointed.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, as long as you can add a signature and some text, that covers about 95% of use cases for a PDF editor.

[–] abnv@infosec.pub 13 points 1 year ago

True. Many things are missing.

My first impression was, it will be able to do real editing , editing what I don't need with same font, size, colour at same place without worrying about alignment etc.

Big disappointment.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

It works fine for most cases